TURNBULL CREEK
Community Development District
June 8, 2021

AGENDA

Turnbull Creek Community Development District
475 West Town Place
Suite 114 St. Augustine, Florida 32092
District Website: www.turnbullcreekcdd.com

June 1, 2021

Board of Supervisors
Turnbull Creek Community Development District Dear Board Members:
The Turnbull Creek Community Development District Board of Supervisors Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. at the Murabella Amenity Center, 101 Positano Avenue, St. Augustine, Florida 32092.

Following is the advance agenda for the meeting:

Roll Call

Public Comments

Staff Reports
Landscape Manager (Presenter: Duval Landscape)
Discussion of Duval Landscape Notice (Presenter: Ernesto Torres)

Engineer (Presenter: JMT)
Update of Pond Bank Priority List

Update of Cleaning Storm Drains

Memorandum Regarding Funding Options for Improvements (Presenter: Jennifer Kilinski)

Consideration of Resolution 2021-04, Classifying Surplus Property (Chain Link Fence) (Presenter: Jennifer Kilinski)

Discussion of Fighting Turtles Agreement (Presenter:	Ernesto Torres / Jennifer Kilinski)

Consideration of Special Meeting for Landscape Contractor’s Presentation (August 3, 2021 @ 9:00 a.m.)

Discussion of Fiscal Year 2022 Proposed Budget (Presenter: Ernesto Torres)

Consideration of Resolution 2021-05, Declaring Budget O&M Assessments for Fiscal Year 2022 (Presenter: Ernesto Torres)

Staff Reports (Part 2)
Attorney (Presenter: Jennifer Kilinski)

Manager (Presenter: Ernesto Torres)

Operation Manager – (Presenter: Jerry Lambert)
Memorandum

Field Operations Manager Picture Report

Duval Audit Reports

Amenity Center Update (Presenter: Erick Hutchinson)
Consideration of Dog Event

Consideration of Flea Market

Presentation from Tocoi Creek High School Swim Team (Jeff Holland)

Presentation from Ancient City Soccer Extension (Casey O’Linn)

Presentation for Amenity Soccer Extension

Supervisor’s Requests and Public Comments

Approval of Consent Agenda (Presenter: Ernesto Torres)
Approval of Minutes of the May 11, 2021 Meeting

Adjournment (Next Scheduled Meeting – August 10, 2021 @ 6:30 p.m.)

I look forward to seeing you at the meeting. If you have questions regarding any of the items on this agenda, please call me in advance of the meeting.

Sincerely,

Ernesto Torres
District Manager

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS

A.

1.

June 2, 2021

Via Electronic Mail and U.S. Mail
Duval Landscape Maintenance, LLC
7011 Business Park Boulevard North, Suite 103 Jacksonville, Florida 32556
Attention: Michael Johnson

Re:	Turnbull Creek Community Development District Landscape & Irrigation Maintenance Services Agreement

Dear Mr. Johnson,1

As you are aware, this firm represents the Turnbull Creek Community Development District (the “District”). The District and Duval Landscape Maintenance, LLC (“Duval”) entered into that certain Landscape & Irrigation Maintenance Services Agreement, dated May 8, 2018, as amended from time to time (“Agreement”), whereby Duval agreed to provide certain services as set forth in the Agreement (the “Services”).

Jerry Lambert, the District’s designated representative (“Representative”) under the Agreement, previously, and consistently, notified Duval of certain deficiencies in Duval’s performance under the Agreement since May 8, 2018. These deficiencies list is attached, compiled by Mr. Lambert. To date, the deficiencies have not been adequately remedied.

Under Section 4 of the Agreement, upon notification of deficiencies from the Representative, Duval must, within 48 hours or in the time period specified by the representative, explain in writing what actions shall be taken to remedy the deficiencies. Upon approval by the District, Duval must take such necessary actions to address the deficiencies within the time period specified by the District or, if no time period is specified, within three days and prior to submitting any invoices to the District. If Duval fails to do so, the District is entitled to certain remedies, including but not limited to fining Duval $100 per day, withholding some or all of Duval’s payments under this Agreement, and contracting with outside sources to perform necessary work, with charges for such services to be deducted from Duval’s compensation.

In the interest of reaching an amicable resolution, please let this letter serve as additional notification of deficiencies. By June 10, 2021, please submit a written explanation of what remedial actions shall be taken to Mr. Lambert at jlambert@rmsnf.com, with a copy to District Manager at etorres@gmsnf.com and District Counsel at Jenk@hgslaw.com. Upon approval from

1 If Duval is represented by legal counsel, please direct this correspondence to him or her, and please let us know your counsel’s contact information so that any future correspondence can be appropriately addressed.

Duval Landscape Maintenance, LLC June 2, 2021
Page 2

Mr. Lambert, please complete the actions within the time specified or within three days, whichever is longer.

If you do not respond or do not complete the necessary remedial actions within the time specified, the District will consider you to be in breach of the Agreement and may pursue all legally available remedies, including but not limited to the remedies specified in Section 4. of the Agreement. Nothing in this letter shall be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy the District has against Duval under the terms of the Agreement or Florida law.

Sincerely,
Hopping, Green & Sams, P.A.
Jenn i fer Ki li n ski
Jennifer Kilinski, Esq.

Enclosure

cc:	Chris DelBene, Chairman (via email)
Jerry Lambert, Operations Manager (via email) Ernesto Torres, District Manager (via email)

Duval Landscape Maintenance, LLC Notice of Deficiencies
Compiled by Jerry Lambert

Date	Project	Description

Duval Landscape Maintenance, LLC Notice of Deficiencies

5/19/21	Duval	Weeds in field around tennis court		
5/19/21	Duval	Weeds in berm along Pacetti/soccer fields		
5/19/21	Duval	Remove dead branches along Pacetti berm		
5/19/21	Duval	Mulch trees along Pacetti side of the soccer field		
5/19/21	Duval	Make distinct mulch beds around trees of Pacetti Berm		
5/19/21	Duval	Repair grass in the soccer field, a lot of dirt only	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Remove weeds in berm between Pescara and the Amenity Center		
5/19/21	Duval	Need a destinct mulch edge on the Pescara/Amenity Center berm		
5/19/21	Duval	Remove moss from the trees near the storage shed	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Remove the weeds and vines from the shrubs between the pool and pond		
5/19/21	Duval	Remove grass at the pool drain box		
5/19/21	Duval	Trim the decorative grass from the lounge chair area. North side		
5/19/21	Duval	Remove weeds near the Amenity Center bike rack		
5/19/21	Duval	Need mulch and distinct beds around trees at the Pescar parking lot		
5/19/21	Duval	Replace the dying flowers (roses) at the Pacetti entrance	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Replace the dying flowers (roses) at the Rt 16 entrance	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Remove the weeds at the Amenty Entrance near the bridge		
5/19/21	Duval	Mulch the Pescara Entrance		
5/19/21	Duval	Rose bushes at Pescara entrance dying off	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Shrubs at W Positano entrance are dying off	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Holly Trees at W Positano entrance dying off	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Fill hole at the W Positano island		
5/19/21	Duval	Trim dead grass at the W Positano entrance island		
5/19/21	Duval	Need the proper number of flowers planted at the W Positano entrance		
5/19/21	Duval	Need the proper number of flowers planted at the Rt 16 entrance		
5/19/21	Duval	Need the proper number of flowers planted at the San Marino entrance		
5/19/21	Duval	Need the proper number of flowers planted at the Pescara entrance		
5/19/21	Duval	Open up the view of the planter at the Pescara entrance	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Shrubs dead at the Rt 16 entrance	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Remove moss from the trees on all the berms	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Clean up all the beds at the Rt 16 entrance		
5/19/21	Duval	Palm tree at the Amenity Center parking lot is dying	Outside Of Contract	
5/19/21	Duval	Cleanup the berm on Ravello Dr		
5/19/21	Duval	Mow the pond on S Cappero Dr		

Compiled by Jerry Lambert and SupervisorRLeambaanrkoswski

Completion Date

5/19/21
5/15/21	Duval
Duval	Remove the Large weedsCoonmthpeipleonddboynJSeCrarpypLearombert and Super
What can be done to revive the holly trees throughout the community	
5/15/21	Duval	Fix the ground cover under the oak trees at the Amenity entrance	
5/19/21	Duval	Replace new dead cedars at the Rt 16 entrance	
5/15/21	Irrigation	Fix the irrigation covers at the Rt 16 entrance	
5/19/21	Irrigation	Replace irrigation head beside the tennis court	
5/19/21	Irrigation	Fix irrigation box leak in soccer field beside Pacetti	

Duval Landscape Maintenance, LLC Notice of Deficiencies
visor Labanowski
Outside Of Contract
Outside Of Contract Outside Of Contract

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

MEMORANDUM

TO:	Turnbull Creek CDD (“District”) Board of Supervisors (“Board”) FROM:	Jennifer Kilinski, District Counsel
RE:	Funding Options for Improvements
DATE:	June 8, 2021

Summary
You asked for us to research funding/financing options for pond reconstruction and amenity enhancements. In doing so, we reviewed your O/S (offering statement with previous bond issues) and Indentures (the trust agreement the District entered into at the time of your last bond issuance). In summary we found the following:
Issuing debt for recreational improvements prior to the call period (2025 timeframe) would be extraordinarily difficult because the Indenture provides that there can be no additional bonds for anything except pond reconstruction or bonds issued for purposes of repair/reconstruction of District improvements (which contemplates a storm or other natural disaster impacting the improvements).
Issuing debt for pond reconstruction work is possible and is contemplated by the Indenture.
The next step if the Board was interested in issuing bonds to finalize pond reconstruction work would be to first obtain an estimated budget number for the reconstruction work. This budget number would provide the information necessary to the Board to decide the funding options available and whether a public offering, private placement (i.e. through a bank), or use of reserve funds makes the most sense. From there, our office in conjunction with MBS can provide a timeline to the Board for validation, if a financing through bonds or private placement is the best route forward, estimated timetables, costs and sample assessment structures for the Board to make the best informed decision. Keep in mind any obligation that exceeds five years must be validated by a court of law – and it only makes sense to do that if the cost warrants the investment.
Action Requested - Options
Authorize the District Engineer to begin work on reviewing pond conditions to develop an order of magnitude/cost estimate for the Board to use in decision making related to pond reconstruction work.
Take information under advisement and defer to future meeting.
Take no action and consider approaching ponds on a case by case basis.

1

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

RESOLUTION 2021-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE TURNBULL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CLASSIFYING SURPLUS TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Turnbull Creek Community Development District (“District”) is a local unit of special-purpose government established pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, for the purpose of providing, operating, and maintaining infrastructure improvements, facilities, and services to the lands within the District; and

WHEREAS, as such, the District is a governmental unit within the meaning of Chapter 274, Florida Statutes (“Governmental Unit”); and

WHEREAS, the District has purchased and owns certain tangible personal property consisting of chain link fencing as more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference (“Surplus Property”); and

WHEREAS, the District desires to classify the Surplus Property as surplus tangible personal property, and to determine that the continued use of the Surplus Property is uneconomical, inefficient to maintain, and/or serves no useful function; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the District (“Board”) has considered the best interests of the District, the value and condition of the Surplus Property, and the probability of the Surplus Property being desired by prospective donees or purchasers; and

WHEREAS, the District desires to dispose of the Surplus Property for value to any person, or for value without bids to the state, to any Governmental Unit, or to any political subdivision as defined in section 1.01, Florida Statutes, or for value to another governmental unit or to a private nonprofit agency as defined in section 273.01 and 274.01, Florida Statutes; or, if such sale cannot reasonably be accomplished, by donating it either to another Governmental Unit or to a private nonprofit agency as defined in section 273.01 and 274.01, Florida Statutes; or, if neither sale nor donation can reasonably be accomplished, the District hereby determines that the Surplus Property is without commercial value and desires to destroy or abandon it, all in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 274, Florida Statutes; and

WHEREAS, the District believes that disposing of the Surplus Property in this fashion is the most efficient and cost-effective means of disposing of the Surplus Property; and

WHEREAS, based on evaluation by staff of the condition of the Surplus Property and the costs associated with disassembly, removal, and haul-off, the District has estimated the value of the Surplus Property to be less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000); and

WHEREAS, the District believes that it is in its best interests to dispose of the Surplus Property in this fashion.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE TURNBULL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. All of the representations, findings and determinations contained within the recitals stated above are recognized as true and accurate and are expressly incorporated into this Resolution.

Section 2.	Classification of Surplus Tangible Personal Property.	The
District hereby classifies the Surplus Property as surplus tangible personal property, and hereby determines that the Surplus Property is obsolete, and/or continued use of the Surplus Property is uneconomical, inefficient to maintain, and/or serves no useful function.

Section 3.	Disposition of Surplus Tangible Personal Property. The District
hereby directs and authorizes staff to dispose of the Surplus Property for value to any person, or for value without bids to the state, to any Governmental Unit, or to any political subdivision as defined in section 1.01, Florida Statutes, or for value to another Governmental Unit or to a private nonprofit agency as defined in section 273.01 and 274.01, Florida Statutes; or, if such sale cannot reasonably be accomplished, by donating it either to another Governmental Unit or to a private nonprofit agency as defined in section 273.01 and 274.01 Florida Statutes; or, if neither sale nor donation can reasonably be accomplished, by destroying or abandoning it, all in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 274, Florida Statutes.

Section 4. Severability. The invalidity or unenforceability of any one or more provisions of this Resolution shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of this Resolution, or any part thereof.

Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of June 2021.

ATTEST:	TURNBULL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairperson, Board of Supervisors

Exhibit A: Description of Surplus Property

Exhibit A

Description of Surplus Property

Four-foot chain link fencing (Tennis Court and Gates) located at: Murabella
101 West Positano Avenue St. Augustine, Florida 32092

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

Turnbull  Creek
Community Development District

Approved Budget Fiscal Year 2022
May 11, 2021

Turnbull Creek
Community  Development  District

TABLE OF CONTENTS

General Fund

Summary of Revenues and Expenditures	Page 1-2 Narrative - Administrative and Maintenance	Page 3-10

Debt Service Fund Budget

Series 2015A1-A2	Page 11-13
Series 2015B1-B2	Page 14-16
Series 2016	Page 17-18

Capital Reserve Fund Budget	Page 19

	Adopted
Budget	
Actual	
Next	
Projected	Approved
Budget	
Description	FY 2021	3/31/21	6 Months	9/30/21	FY 2022	

Revenues						
Maintenance Assessments	$1,126,149	$1,091,857	$34,292	$1,126,149	$1,277,211	
Interest/Miscellaneous	$2,000	$11,296	$736	$12,032	$2,000	
Amenities Revenue	$3,000	$2,098	$1,526	$3,624	$3,000	
Carry Forward Surplus	$61,853	$0	$34,798	$34,798	$99,413	
Total Revenues	$1,193,002	$1,105,251	$71,351	$1,176,602	$1,381,624	

Expenditures						
Administrative						
Supervisor Fees	$5,600	$3,200	$3,200	$6,400	$12,000	
FICA Expense	$428	$245	$245	$490	$918	
Engineering (JMT)	$13,000	$2,000	$11,000	$13,000	$18,000	
Arbitrage (Grau)	$2,400	$0	$2,400	$2,400	$2,400	
Dissemination (GMS & Disclosure Services)	$2,850	$1,200	$1,000	$2,200	$2,850	
Trustee (US Bank)	$14,620	$3,631	$10,259	$13,890	$14,620	
Attorney (HGS)	$47,000	$19,740	$27,260	$47,000	$55,000	
Tax Roll Assessments (GMS)	$5,000	$5,000	$0	$5,000	$5,000	
Annual Audit (BTEGF)	$3,525	$0	$3,745	$3,745	$3,745	
Management Fees (GMS)	$45,000	$22,500	$22,500	$45,000	$53,000	
Information Technology (GMS)	$1,600	$800	$800	$1,600	$1,800	
Telephone	$450	$780	$700	$1,480	$1,000	
Postage	$800	$359	$441	$800	$800	
Printing & Binding	$1,800	$158	$1,642	$1,800	$1,800	
Insurance (FIA)	$9,035	$8,625	$0	$8,625	$9,488	
Legal Advertising	$1,400	$296	$1,104	$1,400	$2,000	
Other Current Charges	$1,000	$515	$485	$1,000	$1,000	
Office Supplies	$170	$9	$50	$59	$170	
Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions	$175	$175	$0	$175	$175	
Website Maintenance	$1,200	$600	$600	$1,200	$1,200	
Total Administrative Expenses	$157,053	$69,833	$87,430	$157,263	$186,966	

Amenity Center						
Insurance (FIA)	$16,134	$14,485	$0	$14,485	$25,421	
Pest Control (Turner Pest Control)	$3,123	$1,138	$1,769	$2,906	$3,123	
Repairs & Replacements	$36,000	$29,799	$17,001	$46,800	$36,000	
Recreational Passes	$800	$235	$200	$435	$800	
Office Supplies	$1,100	$1,331	$500	$1,831	$1,800	
Other Current Charges	$540	$270	$270	$540	$540	
Permit Fees (Pool, ASCAP/BMI/SEASAC)	$2,000	$1,657	$350	$2,007	$2,000	
Utilities						
Water & Sewer (STCUD)	$10,900	$5,595	$5,537	$11,132	$12,000	
Electric (FPL)	$36,000	$13,155	$15,600	$28,755	$36,000	
Telephone/Cable/Internet (Comcast)	$3,800	$1,856	$1,830	$3,686	$3,800	

	Adopted
Budget	
Actual	
Next	
Projected	Approved
Budget	
Description	FY 2021	3/31/21	6 Months	9/30/21	FY 2022	
Management Contracts
Lifeguards/Pool Monitors (RMS)	
$31,245	
$2,549	
$22,451	
$25,000	
$33,312	
Facilty Monitor (RMS)	$24,200	$11,751	$11,751	$23,502	$25,581	
Facility Management (RMS)	$61,000	$30,500	$30,500	$61,000	$64,481	
Facility Attendants (RMS)	$16,200	$5,256	$10,944	$16,200	$17,124	
Field Operations (RMS)	$51,259	$25,629	$25,629	$51,259	$54,184	
Amenity Manager (RMS)	$49,000	$24,500	$24,500	$49,000	$51,796	
Pool Maintenance (RMS)	$14,317	$6,950	$6,950	$13,900	$14,317	
Pool Chemicals (Poolsure)	$13,524	$4,275	$8,395	$12,669	$13,524	
Janitorial Services (RMS)	$9,064	$4,400	$4,400	$8,800	$9,064	
Common Area Waste Collection (RMS)	$18,300	$9,150	$9,150	$18,300	$19,344	
Program Director (RMS)	$2,575	$1,287	$1,287	$2,575	$2,722	
Refuse Service (Waste Management)	$9,840	$5,401	$5,711	$11,112	$11,424	
Security (Envera)	$6,409	$2,958	$2,958	$5,916	$6,409	
Special Events	$9,000	$1,509	$7,491	$9,000	$9,000	
Holiday Decorations	$2,000	$3,380	$0	$3,380	$6,772	
Pressure Washing	$0	$2,950	$0	$2,950	$3,000	
Total Amenity Center Expenses	$428,330	$211,966	$215,174	$427,140	$463,539	

Grounds Maintenance						
Streetlighting (FPL)	$38,000	$19,275	$19,292	$38,567	$40,500	
Lake Maintenance (Future Horizons)	$14,100	$7,050	$7,050	$14,100	$14,100	
Landscape Maintenance (Duval Landscape)	$308,700	$152,034	$152,034	$304,068	$329,700	
Landscape Contingency	$28,000	$13,645	$6,000	$19,645	$28,000	
Irrigation Repairs	$6,000	$0	$3,000	$3,000	$6,000	
Total Grounds Maintenance Expenses	$394,800	$192,004	$187,376	$379,380	$418,300	

Reserves						
Capital Reserves	$212,819	$0	$212,819	$212,819	$312,819	
Total Reserve Expenses	$212,819	$0	$212,819	$212,819	$312,819	
						
TOTAL EXPENDITURES	$1,193,002	$473,804	$702,799	$1,176,602	$1,381,624	
						
EXCESS REVENUES / (EXPENDITURES)	$0	$631,447	-$631,447	$0	$0	
				
FY 2021	
FY 2022	

$ 1,126,149	$ 1,277,211	
$	71,848	$	81,486	
$ 1,197,997	$ 1,358,697	

740	
740	
219	219	
959	959	
$  1,249.22	$  1,416.78	

Net Assessments
Add: Discounts & Collections Gross Assessments
Lots:
Phase I Lots Phase II Lots Total Lots
Per Lot Assessment

REVENUES:

Maintenance Assessments

The District will levy a non ad-valorem special assessment on all taxable property within the District to fund all of the General Operating Expenditures for the fiscal year.

Interest Income

Interest income from maintenance assessments income of the District that will be invested in accordance with Florida Statutes and the investment guidelines approved by the Board of Supervisors.

Miscellaneous

Income from miscellaneous deposits such as UPS, Soccer Team, and HOA Contributions.

Amenities Revenues

Income derived from Recreation Programs, Rental Revenue, Access Cards, and Special Events benefitting the District.

EXPENDITURES:

Administrative:

Supervisor Fees

Florida Statutes allow each board member to receive $200 per meeting not to exceed $4,800 in one year. The amount for the fiscal year is based upon five supervisors attending an estimated 12 annual meetings.

FICA Expense

FICA expense represents the Employer's (District’s) share of Social Security and Medicare taxes withheld from the fee paid to the Board of Supervisors.

Engineering

The District's engineering firm, Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson Inc (JMT), provides general engineering services to the District, including attendance and preparation for monthly board meetings, review invoices, etc.

Arbitrage

The District is required to have an annual arbitrage rebate calculation prepared for its Series 2015A- 1/A-2/B-1/B-2 and the Series 2016, Special Assessment Bonds. Grau & Associates currently provides this calculation.

Dissemination Agent

The Annual Disclosure Report prepared by GMS, LLC and required by the Security and Exchange Commission in order to comply with Rule 15(c)(2)-12(b)(5), which relates to additional reporting requirements for un-rated bond issues.

Dissemination Agent (GMS)	$	2,000	
Revised Amortization schedules (Disclosure)	$	850	
	$	2,850	

Trustee

The District’s Series 2015A-1/A-2/B-1/B-2 and Series 2016, Special Assessment Bonds are held by a Trustee with US Bank. This amount represents the annual fee for the administration of the District’s bond issues.

Attorney

The District's legal counsel, Hopping Green & Sams, will provide general legal services to the District,
i.e. attendance and preparation for monthly meetings, preparation and review of agreements, resolutions, etc.

Tax Roll Assessments

GMS, LLC serves as the District’s collection agent and certifies the District’s non-ad valorem assessments with the county tax collector and maintain the District’s Lien Book.

Annual Audit

The District is required annually to conduct an audit of its financial records by an Independent Certified Public Accounting Firm. Berger, Toombs, Elam, Gaines, and Frank CPA currently serves as the District’s Independent Auditor.

Management Fees

The District receives Management, Accounting and Administrative services as part of a Management Agreement with Governmental Management Services, LLC.

Information Technology

The cost related to District’s accounting and information systems, District website creation and maintenance, electronic compliance with Florida Statutes and other electronic data requirements.

Telephone

Telephone and fax machine

Postage

Mailing of agenda packages, overnight deliveries, correspondence, etc.

Printing & Binding

Printing and Binding agenda packages for board meetings, printing of computerized checks, stationary, envelopes etc.

Insurance (General Liability)

The District's General Liability & Public Officials Liability Insurance policy is with Florida Insurance Alliance. Florida Insurance Alliance specializes in providing insurance coverage to governmental agencies. The premium is based upon amounts charged to similar Community Development Districts.

Legal Advertising

The District is required to advertise various notices for monthly Board meetings, public hearings etc and uses The St. Augustine Record.

Other Current Charges

Bank charges and any other miscellaneous expenses incurred during the year.

Office Supplies

Miscellaneous office supplies.

Dues, Licenses & Subscriptions

The District is required to pay an annual fee to the Department of Economic Opportunity for $175. This is the only expense under this category for the District.

Website Compliance

Represents the costs associated with monitoring and maintaining the District’s website created in accordance with Chapter 189, Florida Statutes. These services include site performance assessments, security and firewall maintenance, updates, document uploads, hosting and domain renewals, website backups, etc.

Amenity Center:

Insurance (Property)

The District's property Insurance policy is with Florida Insurance Alliance, FIA specializes in providing insurance coverage to governmental agencies. The amount budgeted represents the estimated premium for property insurance related to the Amenity Center.

Pest Control

The district is contracted with Turner Pest Control to provide pest control services to treat for termites and other insects and purchase of termite bond.

Repair & Replacements

The District has facility maintenance needs, which include surrounding recreational areas, mail kiosk, and lake banks whose cost is not otherwise covered under a contractual agreement.

Recreational Passes

Represents the estimated cost for access cards to the District’s Amenity Center

Office Supplies

Represents any supplies needed for the operation of the Amenity Center.

Other Current Charges

Any unanticipated cost to the Amenity Center.

Permit Fees/Licenses

Represents Permit Fees paid to the Department of Health for the swimming pool and other license that the amenity center may require from ASCAP, BMI, and SEASAC.

Water & Sewer

The cost of water / sewer associated at the Amenity Center from St Johns County Utility Department.

Account Number	Description	Monthly	Annual	
515577-114371	101 W Positano Ave - Water	$	346	$	4,152	
532445-124596	123 E Franchetta Dr - Water	$	35	$	420	
532445-124406	4106 Messina Dr - Water	$	35	$	420	
532445-124405	168 Toscana Ln	$	35	$	420	
				
515577-114371	101 W Positano Ave - Sewer	$	363	$	4,356	
532445-124596	123 E Franchetta Dr - Sewer	$	40	$	480	
	Contingency	$	146	$	1,752	
	Total	$	1,000	$	12,000	

Electric

The cost of electric at the Amenity Center supplied from FPL.

Account Number	Description	Monthly	Annual Amount	
9623601409	100 Terrancina Dr # Light	$	40	$	480	
9561370132	100 W Positano Ave	$	40	$	480	
5841524282	111 W Positano Ave # Kiosk	$	30	$	360	
8189715355	168 Toscana Lane	$	86	$	1,032	
2781798307	5085 State Road 16 # Light	$	34	$	408	
5191830404	5335 San Giaconio	$	15	$	180	
6555783429	5335 State Rd 16 #1	$	34	$	408	
5907098254	90 E Franchetta Ln # Light	$	15	$	180	
2722888282	101 W Positano Ave	$	2,200	$	26,400	
6889119035	101 W Positano Ave #1	$	335	$	4,020	
	Contingency	$	171	$	2,052	
	Total	$	3,000	$	36,000	

Telephone/Cable/Internet

Comcast is providing the District cost-free phone, cable, and internet service under terms of an agreement reached between the District and Comcast.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
Comcast	316.67	3,800	

Lifeguards/Pool Monitors

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services and this is the cost to provide pool attendants, pool monitors, and lifeguards during the operating season

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	2,776.00	33,312	
Facility Monitor

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services for a variety of clubhouse services including facility monitors for amenity center.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	2,131.75	25,581	

Facility Management

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services for a variety of clubhouse services including an onsite Manager.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	5,373.42	64,481	

Facility Attendants

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services to provide recreational activities at the Amenity Center and will have on-site personnel during daily hours of operation.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	1,427.00	17,124	
Field Operations

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services to provide field operations & contract administration services.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	4,515.33	54,184	

Facility Maintenance

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services for the maintenance of the Amenity Center.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	4,316.33	51,796	

Pool Maintenance

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services for the maintenance of the Amenity Center swimming pool and facilities.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	1,193.08	14,317	

Pool Chemicals

The District, contracts with Poolsure Inc, to provide chemicals necessary for the maintenance of the Amenity Center swimming pool.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
Poolsure 6 months	855	5,129	
Poolsure 6 months	1,399	8,395	
	2,254	13,524	

Janitorial Services

The District is under contract with Riverside Management Services to have janitorial services provided for the Amenity Center.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	755	9,064	

Common Area Waste Collection

Garbage waste pickup in mail kiosk and other common areas provided by Riverside Management Services.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	$1,612	$19,344	

Program Director

The District will provide a part-time Program Director under the Riverside Management Services contract in order to facilitate activities provided by RMS.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
RMS	$227	$2,722	

Refuse Service

Garbage disposal service is with Waste Management.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
Advance Disposal	952	11,424	

Security

The District has contracted with Envera for security monitoring for the Amenity Center billed quarterly.

Contract	Monthly	Annual	
Envera	534	6,409	

Special Events

Represents estimated costs for the District to host special events for the community throughout the Fiscal Year.

Holiday Decorations

Represents cost for rental and installation of holiday decorations and lighting for entry monuments and amenity center.

Ground Maintenance:

Streetlighting

The District street lighting cost for the community supplied by FPL.

Account Number	Description	Monthly	Annual Amount	
2298893591	W Bonaventure Way	$	3,200	$	38,400	
4217317033	Verona Way	$	90	$	1,080	
	Contingency	$	85	$	1,020	
	Total	$	3,375	$	40,500	
Lake Maintenance

The District has 22 storm water management ponds that are required by the County and the St. Johns River Water Management District to provide for treatment of storm water runoff. The District is under contract with Future Horizons. to maintain the 22 storm water ponds.

Contract	Monthly	Annual Amount	
Future Horizons	$	1,175	$	14,100	

Landscape Maintenance

The District is under contract with Duval Landscape to have the landscaping of the common areas of the District maintained.

Contract	Monthly	Annual Amount	
Duval Landscape	$	27,475	$	329,700	

Landscape Contingency

Any unanticipated landscape cost for tree removal or other landscape cost incurred by the District.

Irrigation Repairs

Any miscellaneous irrigation repairs and maintenance incurred by the District.

Capital Reserves

Future funding needed for the upkeep of Turnbull Creek infrastructure.

Turnbull  Creek	Debt Service Fund
Community Development  District	Series 2015A1 and A2

Adopted	Approved	

Description	Budget
FY 2021	Actual
3/31/21	Next
6 Months	Projected
9/30/21	Budget
FY 2022	

Revenues						
Carry Forward Surplus (1)	$235,202	$236,650	$0	$236,650	$226,078	
Interest Income	$5,000	$138	$130	$268	$250	
Assessments	$985,875	$955,854	$30,021	$985,875	$985,875	
Total Revenues	$1,226,077	$1,192,642	$30,151	$1,222,793	$1,212,202	

Expenditures						
Series 2015 A-1
Interest 11/1	

$172,176	

$172,176	

$0	

$172,176	

$165,978	
Interest 5/1	$172,176	$0	$172,176	$172,176	$165,978	
Principal 5/1	$435,000	$0	$435,000	$435,000	$445,000	
Special Call 5/1	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	
Series 2015 A-2
Interest 11/1	

$51,181	

$51,181	

$0	

$51,181	

$48,450	
Interest 5/1	$51,181	$0	$51,181	$51,181	$48,450	
Principal 5/1	$100,000	$0	$100,000	$100,000	$105,000	
Special Call 5/1	$0	$0	$15,000	$15,000	$0	
Total Expenditures	$981,715	$223,358	$773,358	$996,715	$978,855	
						
EXCESS REVENUES / (EXPENDITURES)	$244,362	$969,285	-$743,207	$226,078	$233,347	

(1) Net of Debt Service Reserve Funds						
Debt Service for 11/01/202:2	

Interest	
$158,969	
Interest	$45,956	
Total	$204,925	

Net Assessments	$985,875	
Add: Disc. and Collections (6%)	$62,899	
Gross Assessments	$1,048,773	

DATE	BALANCE	RATE	PRINCIPAL	INTEREST	TOTAL	
11/01/21	$	8,140,000.00		-	$	165,977.50	$	773,153.75	
05/01/22	$	8,140,000.00	3.150%	$	445,000.00	$	165,977.50	-	
11/01/22	$	7,695,000.00		-	$	158,968.75	$	769,946.25	
05/01/23	$	7,695,000.00	3.400%	$	460,000.00	$	158,968.75	-	
11/01/23	$	7,235,000.00		-	$	151,148.75	$	770,117.50	
05/01/24	$	7,235,000.00	3.650%	$	480,000.00	$	151,148.75	-	
11/01/24	$	6,755,000.00		-	$	142,388.75	$	773,537.50	
05/01/25	$	6,755,000.00	3.750%	$	495,000.00	$	142,388.75		
11/01/25	$	6,260,000.00		-	$	133,107.50	$	770,496.25	
05/01/26	$	6,260,000.00	3.800%	$	515,000.00	$	133,107.50		
11/01/26	$	5,745,000.00		-	$	123,193.75	$	771,301.25	
05/01/27	$	5,745,000.00	4.000%	$	525,000.00	$	123,193.75		
11/01/27	$	5,220,000.00		-	$	112,693.75	$	760,887.50	
05/01/28	$	5,220,000.00	4.250%	$	560,000.00	$	112,693.75		
11/01/28	$	4,660,000.00		-	$	100,793.75	$	773,487.50	
05/01/29	$	4,660,000.00	4.250%	$	585,000.00	$	100,793.75		
11/01/29	$	4,075,000.00		-	$	88,362.50	$	774,156.25	
05/01/30	$	4,075,000.00	4.250%	$	610,000.00	$	88,362.50		
11/01/30	$	3,465,000.00		-	$	75,400.00	$	773,762.50	
05/01/31	$	3,465,000.00	4.250%	$	635,000.00	$	75,400.00	-	
11/01/31	$	2,830,000.00		-	$	61,906.25	$	772,306.25	
05/01/32	$	2,830,000.00	4.375%	$	660,000.00	$	61,906.25	-	
11/01/32	$	2,170,000.00		-	$	47,468.75	$	769,375.00	
05/01/33	$	2,170,000.00	4.375%	$	690,000.00	$	47,468.75	-	
11/01/33	$	1,480,000.00		-	$	32,375.00	$	769,843.75	
05/01/34	$	1,480,000.00	4.375%	$	725,000.00	$	32,375.00	-	
11/01/34	$	755,000.00		-	$	16,515.63	$	773,890.63	
05/01/35	$	755,000.00	4.375%	$	755,000.00	$	16,515.63	-	
11/01/35	$	-	-		$	771,515.63	
		$	8,575,000.00	$	3,164,953.76	$	11,739,953.76	

DATE	BALANCE	RATE	PRINCIPAL	INTEREST	TOTAL	
11/01/21	$	2,040,000.00		-	$	48,450.00	$	48,450.00	
05/01/22	$	2,040,000.00	4.750%	$	105,000.00	$	48,450.00	-	
11/01/22	$	1,935,000.00		-	$	45,956.25	$	199,406.25	
05/01/23	$	1,935,000.00	4.750%	$	110,000.00	$	45,956.25	-	
11/01/23	$	1,825,000.00		-	$	43,343.75	$	199,300.00	
05/01/24	$	1,825,000.00	4.750%	$	115,000.00	$	43,343.75	-	
11/01/24	$	1,710,000.00		-	$	40,612.50	$	198,956.25	
05/01/25	$	1,710,000.00	4.750%	$	120,000.00	$	40,612.50	-	
11/01/25	$	1,590,000.00		-	$	37,762.50	$	198,375.00	
05/01/26	$	1,590,000.00	4.750%	$	125,000.00	$	37,762.50	-	
11/01/26	$	1,465,000.00		-	$	34,793.75	$	197,556.25	
05/01/27	$	1,465,000.00	4.750%	$	135,000.00	$	34,793.75	-	
11/01/27	$	1,330,000.00		-	$	31,587.50	$	201,381.25	
05/01/28	$	1,330,000.00	4.750%	$	140,000.00	$	31,587.50	-	
11/01/28	$	1,190,000.00		-	$	28,262.50	$	199,850.00	
05/01/29	$	1,190,000.00	4.750%	$	145,000.00	$	28,262.50	-	
11/01/29	$	1,045,000.00		-	$	24,818.75	$	198,081.25	
05/01/30	$	1,045,000.00	4.750%	$	155,000.00	$	24,818.75	-	
11/01/30	$	890,000.00		-	$	21,137.50	$	200,956.25	
05/01/31	$	890,000.00	4.750%	$	160,000.00	$	21,137.50	-	
11/01/31	$	730,000.00		-	$	17,337.50	$	198,475.00	
05/01/32	$	730,000.00	4.750%	$	170,000.00	$	17,337.50	-	
11/01/32	$	560,000.00		-	$	13,300.00	$	200,637.50	
05/01/33	$	560,000.00	4.750%	$	180,000.00	$	13,300.00	-	
11/01/33	$	380,000.00		-	$	9,025.00	$	202,325.00	
05/01/34	$	380,000.00	4.750%	$	185,000.00	$	9,025.00	-	
11/01/34	$	195,000.00		-	$	4,631.25	$	198,656.25	
05/01/35	$	195,000.00	4.750%	$	195,000.00	$	4,631.25	-	
11/01/35	$	-		-	$	-	$	199,631.25
-	
			$	2,040,000.00	$	802,037.50	$	2,842,037.50	

Turnbull Creek		Debt Service Fund Community Development District	Pond Bank Remediation Series 2015B

Adopted	Approved	

Description	Budget
FY 2021	Actual
3/31/21	Next
6 Months	Projected
9/30/21	Budget
FY 2022	

Revenues						
Carry Forward Surplus (1)	$33,976	$33,517	$0	$33,517	$32,711	
Interest Income	$700	$13	$8	$21	$0	
Assessments	$78,987	$76,581	$2,405	$78,987	$78,987	
Total Revenues	$113,663	$110,112	$2,413	$112,525	$111,698	

Expenditures						
Series 2015B1						
Interest 11/1	$19,535	$19,535	$0	$19,535	$19,535	
Interest 5/1	$19,535	$0	$19,535	$19,535	$19,535	
Principal 5/1	$20,000	$0	$20,000	$20,000	$20,000	
Series 2015B2						
Interest 11/1	$5,313	$5,431	$0	$5,431	$5,075	
Interest 5/1	$5,313	$0	$5,313	$5,313	$5,075	
Principal 5/1	$5,000	$0	$5,000	$5,000	$5,000	
Principal Prepayment 5/1	$0	$0	$5,000	$5,000	$0	
Total Expenditures	$74,695	$24,966	$54,848	$79,814	$74,220	
						
EXCESS REVENUES / (EXPENDITURES)	$38,968	$85,145	-$52,434	$32,711	$37,478	
(1) Net of Debt Service Reserve Funds						

Debt Service for 11/01/202:2

Interest	$19,250
$4,956
Total	$24,206

Net Assessments	$79,318	
Add: Disc. and Collections (6%)	$5,063	
Gross Assessments	$84,381	

Series 2015B-1 Senior Assessment Bonds
AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE

DATE	BALANCE	RATE	PRINCIPAL	INTEREST	TOTAL	
11/01/20	$	915,000.00	2.600%	-	$	19,535.00	$	19,535.00	
05/01/21	$	915,000.00	2.850%	$	20,000.00	$	19,535.00	-	
11/01/21	$	895,000.00	2.850%	-	$	19,250.00	$	58,785.00	
05/01/22	$	895,000.00	3.150%	$	25,000.00	$	19,250.00	-	
11/01/22	$	870,000.00	3.150%	-	$	18,856.25	$	63,106.25	
05/01/23	$	870,000.00	3.400%	$	25,000.00	$	18,856.25	-	
11/01/23	$	845,000.00	3.400%	-	$	18,431.25	$	62,287.50	
05/01/24	$	845,000.00	3.750%	$	25,000.00	$	18,431.25	-	
11/01/24	$	820,000.00	3.750%	-	$	17,975.00	$	61,406.25	
05/01/25	$	820,000.00	3.850%	$	25,000.00	$	17,975.00		
11/01/25	$	795,000.00	3.850%	-	$	17,506.25	$	60,481.25	
05/01/26	$	795,000.00	4.000%	$	25,000.00	$	17,506.25		
11/01/26	$	770,000.00	4.000%	-	$	17,025.00	$	59,531.25	
05/01/27	$	770,000.00	4.000%	$	25,000.00	$	17,025.00		
11/01/27	$	745,000.00	4.000%	-	$	16,525.00	$	58,550.00	
05/01/28	$	745,000.00	4.250%	$	30,000.00	$	16,525.00		
11/01/28	$	715,000.00	4.250%	-	$	15,887.50	$	62,412.50	
05/01/29	$	715,000.00	4.250%	$	30,000.00	$	15,887.50		
11/01/29	$	685,000.00	4.250%	-	$	15,250.00	$	61,137.50	
05/01/30	$	685,000.00	4.250%	$	30,000.00	$	15,250.00		
11/01/30	$	655,000.00	4.250%		$	14,612.50	$	59,862.50	
05/01/31	$	655,000.00	4.250%	$	30,000.00	$	14,612.50	-	
11/01/31	$	625,000.00	4.250%	-	$	13,975.00	$	58,587.50	
05/01/32	$	625,000.00	4.375%	$	30,000.00	$	13,975.00	-	
11/01/32	$	595,000.00	4.375%	-	$	13,318.75	$	57,293.75	
05/01/33	$	595,000.00	4.375%	$	35,000.00	$	13,318.75	-	
11/01/33	$	560,000.00	4.375%	-	$	12,553.13	$	60,871.88	
05/01/34	$	560,000.00	4.375%	$	35,000.00	$	12,553.13	-	
11/01/34	$	525,000.00	4.375%	-	$	11,787.50	$	59,340.63	
05/01/35	$	525,000.00	4.375%	$	40,000.00	$	11,787.50	-	
11/01/35	$	485,000.00	4.375%	-	$	10,912.50	$	62,700.00	
05/01/36	$	485,000.00	4.500%	$	40,000.00	$	10,912.50	-	
11/01/36	$	445,000.00	4.500%	-	$	10,012.50	$	60,925.00	
05/01/37	$	445,000.00	4.500%	$	40,000.00	$	10,012.50	-	
11/01/37	$	405,000.00	4.500%	-	$	9,112.50	$	59,125.00	
05/01/38	$	405,000.00	4.500%	$	45,000.00	$	9,112.50	-	
11/01/38	$	360,000.00	4.500%	-	$	8,100.00	$	62,212.50	
05/01/39	$	360,000.00	4.500%	$	45,000.00	$	8,100.00	-	
11/01/39	$	315,000.00	4.500%	-	$	7,087.50	$	60,187.50	
05/01/40	$	315,000.00	4.500%	$	45,000.00	$	7,087.50	-	
11/01/40	$	270,000.00	4.500%	-	$	6,075.00	$	58,162.50	
05/01/41	$	270,000.00	4.500%	$	50,000.00	$	6,075.00	-	
11/01/41	$	220,000.00	4.500%	-	$	4,950.00	$	61,025.00	
05/01/42	$	220,000.00	4.500%	$	50,000.00	$	4,950.00	-	
11/01/42	$	170,000.00	4.500%	-	$	3,825.00	$	58,775.00	
05/01/43	$	170,000.00	4.500%	$	55,000.00	$	3,825.00	-	
11/01/43	$	115,000.00	4.500%	-	$	2,587.50	$	61,412.50	
05/01/44	$	115,000.00	4.500%	$	55,000.00	$	2,587.50	-	
11/01/44	$	60,000.00	4.500%	-	$	1,350.00	$	58,937.50	
05/01/45	$	60,000.00	4.500%	$	60,000.00	$	1,350.00	-	
11/01/45						$	61,350.00	
				$	915,000.00	$	613,001.26	$	1,528,001.26	

Series 2015B-2 Subordinate Special Assessment Bonds
AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE

DATE	BALANCE	RATE	PRINCIPAL	INTEREST	TOTAL	
11/01/21	$	210,000.00	4.750%	-	$	5,075.00	$	5,075.00	
05/01/22	$	210,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	5,075.00	-	
11/01/22	$	205,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,956.25	$	15,031.25	
05/01/23	$	205,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,956.25	-	
11/01/23	$	200,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,837.50	$	14,793.75	
05/01/24	$	200,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,837.50	-	
11/01/24	$	195,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,718.75	$	14,556.25	
05/01/25	$	195,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,718.75		
11/01/25	$	190,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,600.00	$	14,318.75	
05/01/26	$	190,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,600.00		
11/01/26	$	185,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,481.25	$	14,081.25	
05/01/27	$	185,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,481.25		
11/01/27	$	180,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,362.50	$	13,843.75	
05/01/28	$	180,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,362.50		
11/01/28	$	175,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,243.75	$	13,606.25	
05/01/29	$	175,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,243.75		
11/01/29	$	170,000.00	4.750%	-	$	4,125.00	$	13,368.75	
05/01/30	$	170,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,125.00		
11/01/30	$	165,000.00	4.750%		$	4,006.25	$	13,131.25	
05/01/31	$	165,000.00	4.750%	$	5,000.00	$	4,006.25	-	
11/01/31	$	160,000.00	4.750%		$	3,887.50	$	12,893.75	
05/01/32	$	160,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	3,887.50	-	
11/01/32	$	150,000.00	4.750%		$	3,650.00	$	17,537.50	
05/01/33	$	150,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	3,650.00	-	
11/01/33	$	140,000.00	4.750%		$	3,412.50	$	17,062.50	
05/01/34	$	140,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	3,412.50	-	
11/01/34	$	130,000.00	4.750%		$	3,175.00	$	16,587.50	
05/01/35	$	130,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	3,175.00	-	
11/01/35	$	120,000.00	4.750%		$	2,937.50	$	16,112.50	
05/01/36	$	120,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	2,937.50	-	
11/01/36	$	110,000.00	4.750%		$	2,700.00	$	15,637.50	
05/01/37	$	110,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	2,700.00	-	
11/01/37	$	100,000.00	4.750%		$	2,462.50	$	15,162.50	
05/01/38	$	100,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	2,462.50	-	
11/01/38	$	90,000.00	4.750%		$	2,225.00	$	14,687.50	
05/01/39	$	90,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	2,225.00	-	
11/01/39	$	80,000.00	4.750%		$	1,987.50	$	14,212.50	
05/01/40	$	80,000.00	4.750%	$	10,000.00	$	1,987.50	-	
11/01/40	$	70,000.00	4.750%		$	1,750.00	$	13,737.50	
05/01/41	$	70,000.00	5.000%	$	10,000.00	$	1,750.00	-	
11/01/41	$	60,000.00	5.000%	-	$	1,500.00	$	13,250.00	
05/01/42	$	60,000.00	5.000%	$	15,000.00	$	1,500.00	-	
11/01/42	$	45,000.00	5.000%	-	$	1,125.00	$	17,625.00	
05/01/43	$	45,000.00	5.000%	$	15,000.00	$	1,125.00	-	
11/01/43	$	30,000.00	5.000%	-	$	750.00	$	16,875.00	
05/01/44	$	30,000.00	5.000%	$	15,000.00	$	750.00	-	
11/01/44	$	15,000.00	5.000%	-	$	375.00	$	16,125.00	
05/01/45	$	15,000.00	5.000%	$	15,000.00	$	375.00	-	
11/01/45						$	15,375.00	
				$	210,000.00	$	154,687.50	$	364,687.50	

Turnbull Creek
Community  Development  District	Debt Service Fund
Series 2016

Adopted	Approved	
	Budget	Actual	Next	Projected	Budget	
Description	FY 2021	3/31/21	6 Months	9/30/21	FY 2022	

Revenues						
Carry Forward Surplus	$74,388	$80,894	$0	$80,894	$69,302	
Interest Income	$1,900	$16	$12	$28	$0	
Assessments - Tax Collector	$286,505	$277,780	$8,724	$286,505	$286,505	
Total Revenues	$362,793	$358,691	$8,736	$367,428	$355,806	

Expenditures						
Series 2016						
Interest 11/1	$66,656	$66,656	$0	$66,656	$63,603	
Interest 5/1	$66,656	$0	$66,471	$66,471	$63,603	
Principal 5/1	$155,000	$0	$155,000	$155,000	$160,000	
Special Call 5/1	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	
Total Expenditures	$288,311	$76,656	$221,471	$298,126	$287,206	
						
EXCESS REVENUES / (EXPENDITURES)	$74,482	$282,036	-$212,734	$69,302	$68,600	

Debt Service for 11/01/2022:

Interest	$60,643
Total	$60,643

Net Assessments	$286,505	
Add: Discounts and Collections (6%)	$18,279	
Gross Assessments	$304,784	

Turnbull Creek
Community Development District
Series 2016 Special Assessment Refunding and Revenue Bond

AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE

DATE	BALANCE	RATE	PRINCIPAL	INTEREST	TOTAL

11/01/21	$	3,438,000.00	3.70%	-	$	63,603.00	$	285,073.50	
05/01/22	$	3,438,000.00	3.70%	$	160,000.00	$	63,603.00	-	
11/01/22	$	3,278,000.00	3.70%	-	$	60,643.00	$	284,246.00	
05/01/23	$	3,278,000.00	3.70%	$	167,000.00	$	60,643.00	-	
11/01/23	$	3,111,000.00	3.70%	-	$	57,553.50	$	285,196.50	
05/01/24	$	3,111,000.00	3.70%	$	173,000.00	$	57,553.50	-	
11/01/24	$	2,938,000.00	3.70%	-	$	54,353.00	$	284,906.50	
05/01/25	$	2,938,000.00	3.70%	$	179,000.00	$	54,353.00	-	
11/01/25	$	2,759,000.00	3.70%	-	$	51,041.50	$	284,394.50	
05/01/26	$	2,759,000.00	3.70%	$	186,000.00	$	51,041.50	-	
11/01/26	$	2,573,000.00	3.70%	-	$	47,600.50	$	284,642.00	
05/01/27	$	2,573,000.00	3.70%	$	193,000.00	$	47,600.50	-	
11/01/27	$	2,380,000.00	3.70%	-	$	44,030.00	$	284,630.50	
05/01/28	$	2,380,000.00	3.70%	$	200,000.00	$	44,030.00	-	
11/01/28	$	2,180,000.00	3.70%	-	$	40,330.00	$	284,360.00	
05/01/29	$	2,180,000.00	3.70%	$	208,000.00	$	40,330.00	-	
11/01/29	$	1,972,000.00	3.70%	-	$	36,482.00	$	284,812.00	
05/01/30	$	1,972,000.00	3.70%	$	216,000.00	$	36,482.00	-	
11/01/30	$	1,756,000.00	3.70%		$	32,486.00	$	284,968.00	
05/01/31	$	1,756,000.00	3.70%	$	224,000.00	$	32,486.00	-	
11/01/31	$	1,532,000.00	3.70%	-	$	28,342.00	$	284,828.00	
05/01/32	$	1,532,000.00	3.70%	$	232,000.00	$	28,342.00	-	
11/01/32	$	1,300,000.00	3.70%	-	$	24,050.00	$	284,392.00	
05/01/33	$	1,300,000.00	3.70%	$	241,000.00	$	24,050.00	-	
11/01/33	$	1,059,000.00	3.70%	-	$	19,591.50	$	284,641.50	
05/01/34	$	1,059,000.00	3.70%	$	250,000.00	$	19,591.50	-	
11/01/34	$	809,000.00	3.70%	-	$	14,966.50	$	284,558.00	
05/01/35	$	809,000.00	3.70%	$	260,000.00	$	14,966.50	-	
11/01/35	$	549,000.00	3.70%	-	$	10,156.50	$	285,123.00	
05/01/36	$	549,000.00	3.70%	$	269,000.00	$	10,156.50	-	
11/01/36	$	280,000.00	3.70%		$	5,180.00	$	284,336.50	
05/01/37	$	280,000.00	3.70%	$	280,000.00	$	5,180.00	-	
11/01/37	$	280,000.00	3.70%			$	285,180.00	
						-	
				$	3,593,000.00	$	1,247,288.50	$	4,840,288.50	

Turnbull  Creek
Community Development District	Capital Reserve Fund

Adopted	Approved	

Description	Budget
FY 2021	Actual
3/31/21	Next
6 Months	Projected
9/30/21	Budget
FY 2022	

REVENUES:						
Capital Reserve - Transfer In	$212,819	$0	$212,819	$212,819	$312,819	
Carry Forward Surplus	$323,544	$190,439	$0	$190,439	$331,845	
Total Revenues	$536,363	$190,439	$212,819	$403,258	$644,664	

EXPENDITURES:						
Repair and Replacement	$50,000	$1,866	$20,000	$21,866	$50,000	
Capital Outlay	$50,000	$29,259	$20,000	$49,259	$50,000	
Other Current Charges	$240	$133	$156	$289	$300	
Tootal Expenditures	$100,240	$31,257	$40,156	$71,413	$100,300	
						
EXCESS REVENUES / (EXPENDITURES)	$436,123	$159,182	$172,663	$331,845	$544,364	

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

RESOLUTION 2021-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE TURNBULL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DECLARING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS TO FUND THE PROPOSED BUDGET PURSUANT TO CHAPTERS 170, 190 AND 197, FLORIDA STATUTES; SETTING PUBLIC HEARINGS; ADDRESSING PUBLICATION; ADDRESSING SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors (“Board”) of the Turnbull Creek Community Development District (“District”) has prior to June 15, 2021, approved a proposed budget (“Proposed Budget”) for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2021 and ending September 30, 2022 (“Fiscal Year 2021/2022”); and

WHEREAS, the District Board has determined it is in the best interest of the District to fund the administrative and operations services (together, “Services”) set forth in the Proposed Budget, a current copy of which is attached as Exhibit A, by levy of special assessments pursuant to Chapters 170, 190 and 197, Florida Statutes (“Assessments”), as set forth in the preliminary assessment roll included within the Proposed Budget; and

WHEREAS, the District hereby determines that benefits would accrue to the properties within the District, as outlined within the Proposed Budget, in an amount equal to or in excess of the Assessments, and that such Assessments would be fairly and reasonably allocated as set forth in the Proposed Budget; and

WHEREAS, the Board has considered the proposed Assessments, and desires to set the required public hearings thereon;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE TURNBULL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT:

DECLARING ASSESSMENTS. The current form of the Proposed Budget, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved for use in proceedings to levy and impose the Assessments. Pursuant to Chapters 170, 190 and 197, Florida Statutes, the Assessments shall defray the cost of the Services in the total estimated amounts set forth in the Proposed Budget. The nature of, and plans and specifications for, the Services to be funded by the Assessments are described in the Proposed Budget and in the reports (if any) of the District Engineer, all of which are on file and available for public inspection at the “District’s Office,” c/o Governmental Management Services, LLC located at 475 West Town Place, Suite 114, St. Augustine, Florida 32092. The Assessments shall be levied within the District on all benefitted lots and lands, and shall be apportioned, all as described in the Proposed Budget and the preliminary assessment roll included therein. The preliminary assessment roll is also on file and available for public inspection at the District’s Office. The Assessments shall be paid in one more installments pursuant to a bill

issued by the District in November of 2021, and pursuant to Chapter 170, Florida Statutes, or, alternatively, pursuant to the Uniform Method as set forth in Chapter 197, Florida Statutes.

SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING. Pursuant to Chapters 170, 190, and 197, Florida Statutes, a public hearing on the Assessments are hereby declared and set for the following date, hour, and location:

DATE:	August 10, 2021
HOUR:	6:30 P.M.
LOCATION:	Murabella Amenity Center
101 Positano Avenue
St. Augustine, Florida 32092

PUBLICATION OF NOTICE. The District shall cause this Resolution to be published once a week for a period of two weeks in a newspaper of general circulation published in St. Johns County. Additionally, notice of the public hearings shall be published in the manner prescribed in Florida law.

SEVERABILITY. The invalidity or unenforceability of any one or more provisions of this Resolution shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining portions of this Resolution, or any part thereof.

EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2021.

ATTEST:	TURNBULL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairperson, Board of Supervisors

Exhibit A: Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Proposed Budget

Exhibit A

Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Proposed Budget

(DM TO INSERT – MAKE SURE ASSESSMENT ROLL IS ATTACHED)

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

C.

1.

Turnbull Creek Community Development District
9655 Florida Mining Blvd., Bldg. 300, Suite 305, Jacksonville, Florida 32257

Memorandum

Date:	June 8, 2021
To:	Turnbull Board of Supervisors Ernesto Torres, Richard Whetsel
From:	Jerry Lambert, Operations Manager Erick Hutchison, Amenity Manager
Re:	Turnbull Creek CDD
Monthly Murabella Operations Report

The following is a summary of activities related to the RMS operations of the Turnbull Creek Community Development District.

Site Field Manager: Jerry Lambert
Property maintenance, janitorial, trash cans bags, trash pickup on all roads and common areas and athletic fields, dog pots & mail kiosks & playground areas.
Daily pool maintenance: chemicals & vacuuming, timer changed & ADA lift chairs maintenance.
Follow through with resident concerns in regard to property issues, (Ant hills, irrigation breaks, pond bank erosion issues, pond algae and tree issues, etc.)
Meeting with Duval (Mike Johnson) in regard to landscaping issues and updates.
Communications with Josh Boucher (Duval) with irrigation leaks as they occurred for repairs.
Communication with Chris Railing (Future Horizons) for lake work and monthly reports.
Auditing / Documentation of Duval Landscaping.
Completion of the repairs to the collapsed pool pavers by slide tower and reinforcement of the bulkhead. (see picture report)

Amenity Manager: Erick Hutchison
All rentals and amenities are fully operational and running smoothly
All high touched surfaces are being sanitized daily
Request to have dogs on the amenity field for dog event

Request to have a flea market on the amenity field (money exchanged on CDD property)
Jeff Holland to present for Toccoi Creek HS. Propose to use pool
Casey O’Linn to present for Amenity soccer. Request extension
Erick Hutchison to present on behalf of Amenity soccer. Request for extension

Other Ongoing Projects: Site

Should you have any questions or comments regarding the above information, please feel free to contact me at (248) 807-2763 or Rich at (904) 759-8923.

2.

Riverside Management Services
9655 Florida Mining Blvd, Bldg. 300, Suite 305, Jacksonville, FL 32257

Murabella
Field Operations Manager Report
Date: 6/8/2021	Submitted by Jerry Lambert

Repaired Pavers on Pool Deck Behind Slide Tower and Reinforced bulkhead with 2” x 12” Pressure Treated Lumber

3.

lahdscape Maintenance Checklist (Duval)
-	- ·-	-	--  ------...	Week Startin,: OSJO \ \	
Maintenance Growing SeasonOnly(April 1st - October 31st)
Mowing (byFridayof each week)5 days/ week	lx'T><IXIXIXIXIXfX	Page 1 of 2	
	1X1><:rxrx1xT)(f'X1x		
	Comments	

All Turf & Pond Areas	
Note below all areas orponds not mowed per schedule with reason	
Vlonday  Soccer F,eld & Germ Along Pacen, Rel/ Clubhouse ctrc;,s
<\me111tv Ponds A l S		
rucsday Verona Way, Park & SR16 Entrance/ onds U & ,7. s.9 15 & 16			
.Nednesday - Pescara Fields & playground areas
>onds 111- S			

rhursday Rugusa F e d / Pond Banks #10, 11, 12. 13. 14.	-I'		
'nday - Outer berms off od SR16 & Pacett, Rd			
t.2 String Trimming -		Comments	
frlmming around all obstllcles at every mow,ngcy,le to inc udt>			
C'nces on pon t s tc  gl,t po s. •res ,. I I ..			
l.3 Edging		Comments	
\ti hardscape and ,,Jvcd tralls .11 eJchmowing cyc,c	../		
.. 4 Blowing		Comments	
\Uhardscape areas blown clean, including tennis & b.isketball
·ourts, streets and parkinR lots			
..5 Weed Control		Comments	
' cdu1g of plan·bcJs all natural ari;-.,s and berms			
•re & Post emergcmt appli,;,d at appropriate tnncs			
.6Pruni		Comments	
hrubs,vines and orimental trees in common areas and berms to be
,runed 10 maintain theJr natural shape and
.,,,,,ta;r, J propriate facances betw, en ped,·• rian and vehicle
reas.			
rees (crape Myrtles) shall be pruned when dormant (winter)			
alms trimming shalll be done one time per year (June July)			
.7 Berms		Comments	
erms to be deaned, weeded and manicured, grasses trimmed once year at the same time pine straw is put down (Yearly)		Ort',	oiJ	""'t'"' "1	

\feeds to be removed/ treated year round as needed	"		
2.0 Pesticide Application
.1Turf Pest Control	IX	l>CIXIXIXIXIXIXI	
		Comments	
urf inspected weel y and spot treated	As Nee ed			
nt, mole & cricket controlcan be requested once a year
•ocumention shall be given to owner for proof & chemical		"	tQ>\fc>
( l\	t,.	0 ...	
op Choice grannu ar insect c1de blanket apppl cation for (fire ant
:introl. annua ly at 3 entrances amenity center roadways. bermuda ra ses		
.	
Ire ant spot treatments as needed to control mound outbreaks with
,ther" products (Not Top Choice) as needed		..a\	-ow c, 1C1·	
.2 Shrub & Tree Pest Control		Comments	Page 2of2	

,,.1tP¥tc1.., ,.,,vuf'I\N'fl 10/Sno.10

Shrubs & Trees Pest Control inspected bi-weekly

3.0 Fertilization
Turf Areas	Comments
-:A-;;11":'la_w_n:-a=-r e-:-as=-(;-e:-:n::t:-ry::-s,--:a:-:m:-e:-:n:::.ty::-:--:c-en-:t:-e-r -;;-&_m_a-:il:-:k-.-io-s7k-s-ar-e--;f:--ert-::-::ir-ze-d -+--+- -C:---;l):-'. :-'.c)-:---:r,=.::--N-O--:- ":""-'<' =--, -..,. =r---r.£:--b..fllS

with grannular slow release fertilizers	'l	'-	CcC',i,;c•('	o.a	c$

Tobecompleted in 4 rounds (March, May,September & November)

w.ac.\\	.,...,	ef'$c •

Shrubs & Trees	Comments

Shrubs/ trees to be fertnized twice a year withgrannular slow releasenitrogen source in 2 rounds (March & September)
One app ication of systemic insecticide and liquid fertilizer made to shrubs and trees (A ril or Ma )
Seasonal annuals fertilized on 30 day cycles
4.0 Irrigation(All Inclusive Packace) Guidelines
Bi-Weekly Inspections (26 per year)	Comments
II controllers, sprink er :1eads,valve boxes, adjustments a$ 1eeded,waterin schedules submit a written re ort
Note: This contract shallinclude the following at N/C
.ateral linerepairs, valve repair and replacement as needed,
,o eno,d replacement, Headreplacement,
telocat,on or ad1ustments to heads, Wire splices or cut wires, Valve
>ox replacements, Decoder repairs,
latteryrepacements, Any damage to the landscape due to ,rngat on elated issues 1ke under & over watering
"hese are to to completed w1thm 24 hours of notif1cat1on.
Note: Things that falloutside the contract
t-e water source and pump system or respective controls, Mainline
epairs 4" oi e. Timer re airs, vandalism.	
,.0Mulching
,11 amenity areas, roadways and roundabout mulched twice yearly	,.(
'v1arc'1& late summer) 2" depth
ine straw to be applied to all berms areas twice a year (March & eptember) 3" depth
.0 Seasonal Color	Comments
n'luals sn.:ill be ct-anged out 4 cycles per year (Marci-, June, August­ eptember, December)
Areas of seasonal color are:
Rl6 / San Giacomo entrance (420 plants per installion) acetti Rd/ Terrancina Or ( 85 plantsper installation) lain entrance at Pacetti Rd ( 215 plants per installation)
menity center beds and roundabout ( 612 plants per installation)

hristmas co or display of poinsetta's at amen·ty center entrance at
,e holida ·s			 gnature (Duval):		Signature (Operations Manager) :

   	

--
landscape Maintehan_ce Chec list (Duval)		- 	- 	-	-	- 	WeekStarting: !>ho\•\	
Maintenance GrowingSeason Only(April 1st•October 31st)
Mowing (by Friday of eac:h weekl 5 days/ week	X  .XIXl>Cl>CIXIXIX	Page lofZ	
	XIXIXIXIXIXIXIX		
	Comments	
All Turf & Pond Areas	Note below all areas or ponds not mowedper schedule with reason	
1.1 nd
<\	ay S ccer F 11 & 8,.rm Aron:; Pacett Rd tyP,1d,n	Clubhou,e area			
Iu1)sday Verona Way, Park & SR16 Entran • / o ds II 6 ,7, 8 9, l!i & 16	../		
Nednesday Pescara Fields & playground areas
>onds 111- S	-I		
lllursday Rugusa Field / PondBanks #10, 11, 12, 13, 14,	.,,		
=nday • Outer berms off od SR16 & Pacetti Rd			
l.2 String Trimming		Comments	
rrlmming around all obstacles at every mowingcycle to include	.(		
ences on pond side. l,ght poles, tress &  r J, ..			
l.3 Edging		Comments	
\II hardscape and pavc:>d trarls attach mowingcycle			
1.4 Blowing		Comments	
Ill hardscape areas blown clean, including tennis & basketball
ourts, streets and parktnl! lots	..r		
..5 WeedControl		Comments	
Vceding of plantbeds, all natural areas and berms		'bt.cJS		c	U-1"\	
•re t Post t: 11ergents 3ppfied at approprldle times						
..6 Pruning		Comments	
,hrubs,vines and orimental trees 1n common areas and berms to be
,runed to maintain their natural shape and
na'ntarn approp,i"te di tances between pedestrian and veh,cle
reas			
·rees {crape Myrtles) shall be prunedwhen dormant {winter)			
·alms trimming shalfl be done one time per year (June July)			
.7 Berms		Comments	
,erms to be cleaned, weeded and manicured, grasses trimmed once year at the same time pine straw Is put down (Yearly)			

Veeds to be removed/ treated year round asneeded			
2.0 f'estlcide Application
.1Turf Pest Control	X	">CIXl>Cl>CIXIXIXI	
		Comments	
u,t inspected wee ty and spot treated	( ,s ·.eeae,,			
.nt, mole& cricket controlcanbe requested once a year cumention shall be given to owner for proof & chemical			
op Choice grannu ar insecticide blanket appp, cat,on for (fire ant
ontrol) annually at 3 entrances. amenity cemer, roadways, bermuda rasses			
ire art spot treatments asneeded to rnntrol mound outbreaks with
::ither"' products (Not Top Choice) a needed	../		
.2 Shrub & TreePest Control		Comments			Page 2 of2	

,o

Shrubs & Trees Pest Control inspected bi•weekly			
3.0 Fertllizatlon
3.1Turf Areas	rx	'X'"IXTXTXIXIXTXI	
		Comments	
All lawn areas ( entrys, amenity center & mail kiosks are fertilized with grannvlc1r slow release fertilizers
To be completed in 4 rounds (Mc1rch, May, September & November)		
			
3.2Shrubs & Trees		Comments	
Shrubs/ trees to be fertilized twice a year with grannular slow release nitrogen source in 2 rounds (March & September)			
One application of systemic insecticide and liquid fertilizer m.ide to shrubs and trees (April or Mav)			
Seasonal annuals fertilized on 30 day cycles			
4.0 Irrigation (AllInclusive Packa&e) Guidelines	!X	l'"X7XlXIXIXIXIXI	
Bi-Weekly Inspections (26 per year)		
Comments	
\II controllers, sprinkler heads,valve boxes, adjustments as 1eeded,waterine schedules. submit a written reoort			
Note: This contract shall include the following at N/C
.ateral line repc1irs. valve repair and replacement as needed, iolenold replacement, Headreplacement,
lelocation or adjustments to heads, Wire splices or cut wires, Valve
,ox replacements. Decoder repairs,
lattery replacements, Any damage to the landscape due to irrigation elatedissues likeunder & over watering
nese are to to completed within 24 hours of notification.			
Note: Things that fall outside the contract
'he water source and pump system or respective controls, Mainline eoairs 4" pipe, Timer repairs vandalism.			
,.OMulching		Comments	
,II amenity areas, roadways and roundabout mulched twice yearly March & late summer) 2" depth			
ine straw to be applied to all berms arec1s twice a year {March & eptember) 3" depth			
.oSeasonal Color		Comments	
.nnuals shallbe changed out 4 cycles per year(March, June, August- eptember, December)		

./	
Areas of seasonal color are:			
R16 / San Giacomo entrance 1420 plants per installion)			
acettl Rd/ Terrancina Or { 85 plants per installation)			
1ain entrance at Pacetti Rd { 21S plants per Installation)			

menity center beds and roundabout ( 612 plants per installation)			
hristmas color display of poinsetta's at amenity center entrance at 1e holidavs	I			
·gnature COuval):	Wl(	(I		Signature (Operations M,mager) :	1Y	
J	(.J

lands.cape Mamte-nance Checklist (Duval)	
WeekStarting: S}\""\ \ ,	
Maintenance
:irowing SeasonOnly (April 1st-October 31st)
Mowing (byFriday of each week) 5 days/ week	C><l><IXI.XIX.IXIXIX	Pagelof2	
	C><l><:IXIXIXIXIXIX		
	Comments	

All Turf & Pond Areas		
Note below all areasor ponds not mowedper schedule withreason	
VI n 1ay S crer Field & B1mn Aton, Pacett Rd C ub o• searea,
.\,.,, , ty Pond, II 1 5			

)_\..e.<	c._.:i,.	vC'-
,\,..-..,	-""-.t.	rf'M, ; •	
n ay Verona Way Park & SRlt, Entra
>, r d111 6,,. 8	. 5&1				
Nednesday  Pescara Fields & playground areas
>onds # 1 5			
hursday Rugusa Field/ Pond Banks #10, 11, 1.2, 13, 14,			
:riday Outer berms off od SR16 & Pacetti Rd			
l.2 StringTrimming		Comments	
_-,_,m_m_·n_g_a_ro_u_n_d_a_l_l o_b_s_ta_c_le_s_a_t_e_v_e_rv_m_o_w_m_g_c_y_cl_e_t_o_n_c_lu_d_e_---J cnces on pond side. I ght poles, tress & shrubs.	1/		
l.3 Edging		Comments	
Ill hardscape anti paved trails al eachmowing cycle			
..4Blowing		Comments	
\II hardscape areasblown clean, including tl'nnis & basketball
.ourts, streets and parking lots			
..5 Weed Control		Comments	
Vtceding of pl'lnt beds. all natural area, and berrr
'		
t	_,
y		
re & Post emergems appllt:d at appropriate times			
..6 Pruning		Comments	
hrubs,vines and orimental trees in common areas and berms to be
,runed to ma,nta,n their natural shape and
1ai1vain appropna•e, IS'ances lierwe, n peces nan an  ve 11cle
reas.		 		
rees (crape Myrtles! shall be pruned when dormant (winter)			
alms trimming shallI be done one t,me per year (June July)			
.7 Berms		Comments	
erms to be cleaned, weeded and manicured, grasses trimmed once year at the same time pine straw is put down (Yearly)			

Veeds to be removed/ treated year round as needed			
2.0PesticideApplication
,1Turf Pest Control	X	.><IXI.X.IXIXIXIXJ	
		Comments	
pected wee y and spot treated	A· Ne• le		.r		
nt, mole & cricket control can be requested once a year
ocumention shall be given to owner for proof & chemical			
op Choice grannu ar msecucide blanket appp1Cat1on Lr • e ant ontrol} annually at 3 entrances, amenity center, roadways. bermuda
rasses			
ire ant spot treatments as needed to control mound outbreaks with
:>ther" products (Not Top Choice) as needed	/		
.2 Shrub & Tree Pest Control		Comments	Page 2 of 2	

,

·

PttJMf"otdbv Jeuvl.MnMrt lD/S/1010

Shrubs & Trees Pest Control inspected bi-weekly			
3.0 Fertilization
3.1Turf Are;i5	X	><IXIXIXIXIXIXI	
		Comments	
All lawn areas ( entrys, amenity center & mail kiosksare fertilized with grannular slow release fertilizers
To be completed in 4 rounds (March, May,September & November)			
3.2 Shrubs & Trees		Comments	
Shrubs/ trees to be fertilized twice a year with grannular slow release nitrogen source in 2 rounds (March & September)			
Oneapplication of systemic insecticide and liquid fertilizer made to
;hrubs and trees {April or Mavl			
5easonal annuals fertilized on 30 day cycles	,r	11«\,\	vd..,t_, •	
4.0Irrigation(All lm:lusive Package) Guidelines	X	:><IXIXIXIXIXIXI	
Bi-Weekly Inspections (26 per year)		Comments	
II controllers, sprinkler heads.valve boxes. adjustments as 1eeded,waterin11schedules, submit a written reoort			
Note: This contract shall include the following at N/C
.ateral linerepairs, valve repair and replacement as needed, iolenold replacement, Headreplacement,
le location or adjustments to heads, Wire splices or cut wires, Valve
>ox replacements, Decoder repairs,
lattery replacements, Any damage to the landscape due to irrigation elated issueslike under & over watering
"hese are to to completed within 24 hours of notification.			
Note: Things that fall outside the contract
ne water source and pump system or respective controls, Mainline epairs 4" oioe, Timer reoairs, vandalism.			
,.OMulchlng		Comments	
,II amenity areas, roadways and roundabout mulched twice yearly March & late summer) 2" depth			
ine straw to be applied to all berms areas twice ayear {March & eptember) 3" depth			
.0 Seasonal Color		Comments	
.nnuals shall be changed out 4 cycles per year (March, June. August• eptember. December)			
Areas of seasonal color are:			
Rl6 / San Giacomo entrance (420 plants per installion)			
acetti Rd/ Terrancina Dr ( 85 plants per installation)			
1ain entrance at Pacetti Rd ( 215 plants per installation)			
menity center beds androundabout ( 612 plants per installation)			
hristmas color display of poinsetta's at amenity center entrance at			
1e holidavs	lj				
lgnature (Duval):	1'i][	)j.	11.1 _,		Signature (Operations Manager):	
I		

'	V

Prep.teaby Jmy umttm10/S/.2020

.

	..
·-	Week Starting: '5\ "\\'a'\	
.1,.0Maintenance·	,,
::;rowing Season Only (April·lst - October 31st)
1.1Mowing (byFriilav.of;e .w .k)sdays/ week	X	.X.IXIX-IXIXIXIX	Page 1 of 2	
	IXi><IXl.XIXIXTXIX		
	Comments	
All Turf & Pond Areas	Note below allareas oc ponds not mowedper schedule withreason	
...,, nday - Soc-er Field & Berm A ong Pacett' Rd C ubho se areas
r ,er·ty Pond\ 111· 5		u.J	f-,'1\.	(\,  , to..	\i\lt.h1f' ..	
-  sday- Veron I Way Park & SR16 Entrance
>o ds :t 6, , 8 , 15 & 16	-	i	O'- "'	O"'\
'-	►S	.	
Nednesday Pescara Fields & playground areas 'onds111 5	·
.		
ihursday • Rugusa Field / PondBanks #10, 11, 12, 13, 14,	.(		
'nday • Outer berms off od SR16 & Pacem Rd	'		
L.2 Stril)g Tri!"ming		commenu	
rimming around an obstacles at every mowing cycle to include			
l!nces on pond sid . light poles. tru  t.	h· 11:> .				
.. 3'Edging		Comments	
111 hardscape and paved trailsat each mowing cycle			
..4 Blowing		Comments	
Ill hardscape areas blown clean, including tennis & basketball ourts, streets and parkinl! lots	"		
..S Weed Control		Comments	
Veeding of plant beds,all natural are;,s and berms			
're & Post emergent applii:d at appropriate times			
..6 Pruning		Comments	
hrubs,vines and orlmental trees in common areas and berms to be
,runed to maintain their natural shape and
1aintain appropriate di,tances between pedestri.rn and vehicle	"	.,CJ	''"	().J	N<\"'	,cu,ls.''I."''''I
0 "e" ,.a w'owi'"o". '	N ""	i'C'A\\	o,J	
reas.			
rees (crape Mynles) shall be pruned when dormant (winter)			
alrns trimming shalll be done one time per year (June July)			
.7 Berms		Comments	
erms to be cleaned, weeded and manicured, grasses trimmed once		l1c.-\	• ...J	,ri:-...f'	I,.-	S".,# JVq	LJ ,,-
C.• -,01-e:t,,,I. rJ47\
•	•	
year at the same time pinestraw is put down (Yearly)			

1/eeds to be removed/ treated year round as needed		tc")	o,-.1)	()t"	1"C.ot'f\	I' ..	
2.0 Pesticide Application	IX
,1Turf Pest Control		IX:IXIXIXIXIXIXI	
		Comments	
urf inspected weel y and spot treated		s Needed)			
nt, mole & cricket control can be requested once a year
ocumention shall be given to owner for proof & chemical			
op Choice grannular insecticide blanket appplication for I fire ant
,ntrol) annua ly at 3 entr-1nces, amenity center. roadways. bermuda
,asses			
ire ant spot treatments as,needed to control mound outbreak with
,ther" products (Not Top Choice) as needed			
.2 Shrub & TreePest Control		Comments	Page 2 of 2	

landsc pe Maintenance Checklist (Ouval)	,
•

Shrubs & Trees Pest Control inspected bi-weekly			

3.1Turf Areas	3,0 Fertilization	X	><IXIXl><IXIXIXI	
			Comments	
All lawn areas ( entrys, amenity center & mailkiosks are fertilized withgrannular slow release fertillzers
Tobe completed in 4 rounds (March, May, September & November)		u,J	'°-.".','".c,,).
we(,,	h•"	,,.  \U.('J'\	,_	
3.ZShrubs & Trees		Comments	
Shrubs/ trees to be fertilized twice a year withgrannular slow releasenitrogen source in 2 rounds (March & September)			
One application of systemic Insecticide andliquid fertilizer made to
;hrubs and trees (Aoril or Mavl			
ieasonal annuals fertilized on 30 day cycles			
4.0 Irrigation (AllInclusive Packa1e) Guidelines	X	XIXIXIXIXIXfXI	

Bi-Weekly Inspections (26 per year)		
Comments	
\II controllers, sprinkler heads.valve boxes, adjustments as 1eeded,waterinl! schedules, submit a writtenreport			
Note: This contract shall include the following at N/C
.ateral hne repairs, valve repair andreplacement as needed, iolenoid replacement, Headreplacement,
telocation or adjustments to heads, Wire splices or cut wires, Valve iox rep acemerits, Decoder repa·rs,
lattery replacements, Any damage to the landscape due to irrigation
elated issues likeunder & over watering
"hese are to to completed within 24hours of nottflcatlon.			
Note: Things that falloutside the contract
"he water source andpump system or respective controls, Mainline eoairs 4" oioe. Timer reoairs, vandalism.			
.0Mulching		Comments	
,II amenity areas, roadways androuridabout mulched twice year1y Vlarch & late summer) 2" depth			
ine straw to be applied to all berms areas twice a year (March & eptember) 3" depth			
.0 Seasonal Color		Comments	
nnuals shall be changed out 4cycles per year (March, June, August- eotember. December)		
(	.. Q,\',,
p.,\	"""'°''	..J \\t(	t	ail
.I
....tc>>.	
Areas of seasonal color are:				
R16 / San Giacomo entrarice (420 plants per installion)				
acetti Rd / Terrancina Dr ( 8Splants per installation)				
lainentrance at Pacetti Rd( 21S plants perinstallation!				
menity center beds androundabout ( 612plants perinstallation)				
hristmas color display of poinsetta's at amenity centerentrance at				
1e holidays					

gnature (Duval):	'yf		'1	Si	gnature (Operations Manager} : ,-J	
(/	V

D.

5.

Amenity Soccer

Season dates may be subject to change but here’s what I know for Fall Soccer 2021:

Registration begins July 1 Registration ends August 15
Practices could start as early as September 6. Season Games begin September 25
Season games end November 13.

8 season games all played at Heritage Landing.

We are kindly asking permission for residents of Murabella to be able to use their fields for fall soccer practices only.

10% Murabella Resident Revenue share will be paid to the district as well.

Thank you so much Erick, we really appreciate you presenting this to the board on behalf of Amenity Athletics.

If it’s not too early to present and get permission for winter flag football, I have some tentative dates for that as well.

2022 Winter Flag Football Registration begins October 15 Registration ends November 30 Practices start early January 29 Season games begin March 12 No games are at Murabella.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS

A.

TURNBULL CREEK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Turnbull Creek Community Development District was held Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. at the Murabella Amenity Center, 101 Positano Avenue, St. Augustine, Florida.

Present and constituting a quorum were:

Chris DelBene	Chairman
Diana Jordan-Burks	Vice Chairperson (by telephone)
Brian J. Wing	Supervisor
Chuck Labanowski	Supervisor
Jeremy Vencil	Supervisor

Also Present were:

Ernesto Torres	District Manager
Jennifer Kilinski	District Counsel
Steve Collin	District Engineer
Jerry Lambert	Operations Manager
Erick Hutchinson	Amenity Manager
Michael Johnson	Duval Landscape Maintenance

The following is a summary of the actions taken at the May 11, 2021 meeting. An audio copy of the proceedings can be obtained by contacting the District Manager.

FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS	Roll Call
Mr. Torres called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. and called the roll.

SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS	Audience Comments
Ms. McManus stated I live on a pond and along with my neighbors and others in the community continue to have problems with people going in the back of our houses. I know there is a policy that people are not supposed to be behind private homes, but none of them know this. There is no posting anywhere that says they cannot go behind private homes. Sometimes when you tell them it goes very well and other times it starts an argument. People can park in Gators parking lot, walk down Murabella Parkway and I have seen them with buckets and poles and go

behind people’s houses and fish because there is no sign anywhere saying they can’t. What are you going to do as far as providing safety for the people who live on the pond to prevent strangers from being in the back of our homes? When I call the sheriff I have been told they won’t come out for trespassing.
Mr. Vencil stated I have talked to the head of the HOA who is interested in putting up additional signage at their expense if we approve that they are allowed to do so. I don’t think there is anything else we can do to address this.
Mr. DelBene stated this item is not on the agenda tonight. I support having private property sign added to the agenda, it is not on the agenda this evening. We have no enforcement authority.
Ms. Kraus stated our kids have been part of the Fighting Turtles for four years, I’m on the board as well and we are here to voice a strong opposition to the dead ends our team is facing with Murabella. We brought a lot of the community together and our community is getting younger and younger, we are not a retirement community, we are a family community and I think we should be supportive of healthy, active sports with our kids. I also think we need to consider the high school swim team. We are going to have our kids going to school there and some of you may have your kids there and it makes sense to support our local high school any way we can because they want someplace they can practice locally. None of the St. Johns County schools have swimming pools, they all use community pools. I don’t see why we need to snub our noses to an opportunity to support our younger community.
Mr. Kraus stated my experience over the past four to five years that the swim team has made on the people I have seen in our community. We go these other neighborhoods and from 6 to 11:30, they are selling donuts, coffee and pastry, they have 300-400 people standing around spending $20 each on a Saturday morning then the food truck shows up. I’m looking at it from the revenue side. I don’t know the numbers that the Hammerheads make over here when they do their events. We have not done it here because of the blocks but now they said they would buy the blocks for us and take care of installing them it is just if we let them practice here.
Ms. Kraus stated we would be practicing right now but we have been told by the CDD that we are not allowed to practice anymore because there have been complaints by retirees not being able to swim but we always leave a lane open for whoever wants to swim and we also said if they need an additional lane we can practice that way as well. It is a shame we have 80 kids right now

that can’t enjoy this empty swimming pool because of a few older people who wants to give us a hard time.
Mr. DelBene stated over the past two weeks I have been to the pool six or seven times, three of them coincided with your practices. Every day I was there all the lanes were used.
Ms. Kraus stated one lane is designated for everyone.
Mr. DelBene asked Erick, did we say they couldn’t use our swimming facilities?
Mr. Hutchinson stated there might have been some confusion. Because King & Bear is having renovations done, there was a timeline where the Fighting Turtles were going to be here, which hadn’t happened in the past because they were in the morning and this was something new where they came during peak hours. After I heard there were some complaints I got word from Jennifer that they were going to be opening back up. Then I got an email a couple days later saying that the health inspector did not actually go over there so they were unable to open the pool. I spoke with Jennifer and I said I believe you were not allowed to come back because I haven’t discussed it with the board members and the meeting was coming up and I felt this would be what I was going to talk about. This just happened last week.
Ms. Mandolph stated I’m here to ask the board to think about the infrastructure in the Murabella community, the ponds. The ponds are a high priority in the CDD before they get worse. Forget worse, on 2140 S. Sorrento, the ponds aren’t coming in sidewise it is coming in vertically. My daughter now has an 8-foot area coming into her house about 3-feet wide and they call it the end. The CDD property is infringing on her property. This is the third engineer you have had come out and look at it. Some of the ponds were fixed and some were fixed a couple of times and they are still not right. Please work on this ASAP.
Mr. Turnell stated I did comment to you on Facebook about the Fighting Turtles using the pool that day, Thursday from 4 – 7, which I thought was excessive. I think 4 – 6 four days a week, but going until 7 there are people who are no longer coming to the pool because it is so packed and you don’t want 6 and 7 people in a lane. I’m not opposed to it being used maybe we could work with a 2-hour block so people could use it from 6 until closing. As to opening it to the high school to me for what I’m paying, this is my primary amenity and it is one thing to use it for our team but now lose the amenity for other kids then I have a real problem with that. The high school should have built their own pool. Our team is one thing but not opening it up to other groups.

A resident stated I totally agree, we pay our CDD fees for a little privacy, not all of us have schools in our backyards and that pool is my sanctuary. Fighting Turtles are okay but not the high school.
Ms. Slevin stated as the board is aware I have been documenting Duval’s lack of contractual landscape throughout Murabella for a few years. This includes numerous emails to Ernesto and Jerry with photos included. Many of these items had been signed off on a weekly checklist by Jerry and Mike from Duval. Numerous items have not been completed. Photos depict the lack of Duval doing their job and per contract. I trust that the board will hold Duval accountable for the lack of completing numerous items over the years and have been fixed before the end of the contract in September.
Ms. Venezia stated on the pond bank repairs, we have a list of those homes that needed repair from the end of 2016 that were scheduled for repair in 2017. All of those have been ignored. I am hoping that the board will start now and review those homes that needed repair from 2016.
Mr. Torres stated we would like to move item six under the engineer’s report so that he will be present during this discussion.

THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports
Landscape Manager (Presenter: Duval Landscape)
Discussion of Berm Conditions
Mr. Johnson stated we have had some issues and we have taken care of the issues. I know Sharon Slevin has a lot of issues she wants us to do, but we have to do a pretty decent job. Instead of reaching out to you and giving you a list of action items we completed, I wanted to see if there is anything that the board or management requests.
Mr. Torres stated I know between meetings we added the pictures of the berm and that is in the agenda books and those pictures were taken approximately April 12th and the chair wanted to have that so you could discuss that.
Mr. Johnson stated I responded that same Saturday. The pine straw guys were coming in and they were in the wrong spot. Instead of being behind my guys they got in front of them, which we did correct then we had them back since then. We removed debris, weeds and they will come back to re-pine straw. If there is anything else the board or homeowners see that needs to be done, then reach out to me.

Mr. Vencil stated I live near the Pescara entrance and it looks like garbage. Nothing has been touched there, the pine straw hasn’t been touched, there is grass growing through the pine straw. Having said you walked the property and it looks fine makes me question how much of the property you have actually looked at.
Mr. Johnson asked have you brought this up to Ernesto or Jerry?
Mr. Vencil stated I have brought it up like the other board members and it is not being taken care of.
Mr. Johnson stated I will be with Jerry tomorrow and I will make sure this gets addressed. Mr. Labanowski stated I’m concerned if Jerry is going out there with Mike, why isn’t he holding them accountable to get these things done. There should be a specific check list of what has to be done. The check list worked for a very short time and has not been correct for a long time. Limbs need to be trimmed and pine straw needs to be laid down. I’m concerned this isn’t being managed strong enough on our end. Jerry needs to get on top of this and if the job isn’t done
right we need to deduct that from them.
Mr. Lambert stated Mike is very reactive when I call him and he is here that day or the next day. If I’m missing something a lot of that isn’t his fault and I may be missing it, but we put in five trailer loads of pine straw in the past couple of months.
Mr. Wing stated I don’t know when these pictures were taken and some of these berms we don’t even own, they are not ours to maintain.
Mr. Lambert stated the ones I took pictures of were taken care of and that is the big long one in the back.
Mr. DelBene stated the undated photos are from me walking the back east side of our property line and that is the entire east berm.
Mr. Lambert stated that is the one I’m talking about.
Mr. Vencil asked why wasn’t it done in March when it was due?
Mr. Johnson stated it is very hard to get a lot of the pine straw and mulch in the last six to nine months because of the pandemic. I’m not here to make excuses, but when I can get it I get it and do it.
Mr. DelBene stated in the past we have sent a good faith notice to Duval to get the things in the contract done.

Mr. Torres stated I did that once with the issue that occurred, it was corrected and then when I brought it to the board for payment there was no fine set. In the contract there are provisions that once we send a notice of any deficiency based on their contract they will be fined.
Mr. DelBene stated the southernmost portion of our neighborhood is horrendous. Mr. Lambert stated that was all done.
Mr. DelBene stated the problem is as the photos show the pine straw was put over weeds and the weeds have been growing for months if not years and the weeds look like bushes. What we are contracted for that Duval is not being done. We need a list of contractual obligations that are not being performed and a good faith letter for those to be done within the 30-day period or whatever the contract language sets out.
Ms. Kilinski stated right now our contract provides for $100 per day fines upon notice and failure to comply. There are also damages provisions within the contract so what you are setting out is exactly what I would recommend we do and what we did last time, which is take pictures, have a list of things that need to be remedied, give a certain amount of days. There is no contractual amount of days that are in there, it is something that would be reasonable depending on the deficiency and at the end of 7 or 14 days it is not completed, then you start assessing the $100 fine.
Mr. DelBene stated it is my recommendation that Jerry put the list together, put into a good faith letter and a fine gets attached from here on out if it can’t get done within the time period specified.
Mr. Vencil stated I would like to see the list before it is sent to make sure that there is an opportunity to add any additional trouble spots that may have been missed.
Mr. DelBene stated so long as it is contractually based.
Mr. Torres asked once the deficiencies are identified what is the time period you would like to specify?
Mr. DelBene stated it will be based on what the deficiencies actually are.
Ms. Kilinski asked do you want to delegate a board member to work with staff? Mr. Labanowski stated I will work with them.
Mr. Wing stated I suggest we leave it to Ernesto, maybe in consultation with Jennifer, here is the list what is a reasonable period of time.

Mr. DelBene stated if any board members or audience members have an area that you personally identified, we have a lot of land in the community, send an email to Ernesto, Jerry or any board member.
Mr. Torres stated now that we have designated Supervisor Labanowski, we can’t communicate with Jeremy we will communicate with Chuck.
Ms. Kilinski stated if you send it all to us we can compile it into one but Chuck will ultimately be the one to bless the final letter given the Board’s direction.

Engineer (Presenter: JMT)
Update on Topographic Survey
Mr. Torres stated at the March meeting the board approved a topographic survey and Steve is here to talk about that and also the scope for the pond bank repairs that JMT has provided for the board to review.
Mr. Collin stated the survey we obtained was of the flooding areas around the soccer field and the pedestrian path surrounding stormwater pond and on the opposite side of the berm from that. We plan to review that and provide recommendations of what will likely be the solution. The surveyor found a lot of debris in the existing storm drains. I was surprised to see that you already had storm drainage and catch basins, yard inlets in the areas where most of the flooding is observed. The fact that the surveyors found a lot of debris in there I’m wondering if you ever hired somebody to clean out the storm drains.
Mr. Lambert stated we have not, we have talked about that.
Mr. Collin stated the first thing we recommend is to find somebody to clean those out. The grades where the catch basins are set should be sending a lot of that ponded water to the pond right now. There was also some ponding observed on the other side of the berm, on the north side of the berm, from the pedestrian path and there I want to take more time to review the survey and we will probably recommend an extension of the catch basin to go to the other side of the berm and connect into the existing system to then be able to drain that into the pond as well. I was surprised that you already had a drainage system exactly where you were experiencing flooding.
Mr. Lambert stated I had one quote to regrade that area and put in an additional drain to move more water and that was $6,200. I will get them cleaned out.

Mr. Torres asked do you want staff to put the energy behind cleaning out the storm drains and catch basins or wait until we get additional information from the survey?
Mr. Wing stated I suggest Jerry go ahead and have it cleaned because until we clean it out they aren’t going to be able to do anything more. So, up to $6,000 because that was what the whole thing was for grading and everything. Cleaning it out will be a lot less.

On MOTION by Mr. Labanowski seconded by Mr. Vencil with all in favor staff was authorized to have the inlets and catch basins by the soccer field cleaned in an amount up to $1,000.

Mr. Collin stated we will also proceed with developing a recommendation for an additional catch basin or if there is anything we observe once we have a chance to review the survey in more detail.

Consideration of Scope for Pond Bank Repairs
Mr. Collin stated I put together a memo with the various options that we use on various CDDs to stabilize pond banks. The cheapest solution is filling in the erosion and resodding and that tends to be about $40-$50 per linear foot. You can put in a littoral shelf with cattails on the bottom and if you get part of the erosion it is because of changing water levels you can start to get that kind of vertical bank on the bottom a littoral shelf will be really good to solve that. Some people like the look of stone and riprap and that is the hardest solution you can do. What we recommend since this seems to be a recurring issue is the geoweb containment system, which is a web of plastic you put down first and you fill over top of that then seed over the top of that, the worst that will happen in the future if there is erosion is the sod will wash away and we have to put sod back on it. You won’t have this massive erosion that you seem to be having. We also noticed that all the addresses that were identified by Jerry and Brian are very close to each other and we saw where the previous person had done something and erosion was now occurring immediatey adjacent to what they did. We see that a lot and we recommend you hire someone to stabilize the entire length of the pond bank where we are having these problems. It is a total of about 2,800 feet if you use the geoweb that tends to be about $65-$75 per linear foot excluding the cost of any imported fill they have to bring in.

I was asked to get board direction on which solution they want us to get plans together for and get a bid for it. I need to put together a plan and scope so I can get a consistent bid from various vendors who can do this work.
Mr. Wing stated 2,800 linear foot at $65-$75 is roughly $200,000. How much do we have in the budget, $15,000?
Mr. Torres stated your capital reserve is $159,000. Mr. Wing stated we can’t use all the capital reserves.
Mr. Collin stated we don’t recommend spot treatment of stabilizing the locations that are eroding. We could put together plans and get an estimate to do that.
Mr. Labanowski stated we have to do something and not keep putting this off. Mr. DelBene asked how is the bond market?
Ms. Kilinski stated it is very favorable, but you will not want to issue less than $1.5 million because of the cost of issuance. We just got a 3% to 3.5% in two closings within the last two weeks.
Mr. Vencil stated if we are going to issue bonds to do additional improvements to the neighborhood I’m not in favor if it doesn’t address things besides the pond banks. I want to see more improvements to the amenities.
Ms. Kilinski stated I don’t think your bonds are callable until 2025 but I can talk to the underwriter and be prepared to talk about potential options for refinancing or additional bonds. If you want to do additional bonds, then you need to get your wish list as you have been discussing as to other improvements you may have been delayed in making. I have been here long enough to hear several things that you have contemplated but put off. A lot of that has been in the capital reserve list. Those are the things you may want to contemplate and do a supplemental engineer’s report as you did with your pond banks for all those improvements you want to finance then we would have to look at your validation to see if you need to go back and validate or not. It is not going to cost you anything to consider those potential options with the underwriter.
Mr. Torres stated the $212,000 contribution for FY 21 has not transferred from general fund to the capital reserve and that will bring it up to $371,000. The other point I would like to make is last year this board approved the contribution in your capital reserve study to put $70,000 in lake bank stabilization and another $71,000 this year. The reason why your capital reserve

contribution is $200,00+ a year was to justify for the pond bank stabilization expense, knowing we were probably not going to do one until we had a sufficient amount.
Mr. DelBene stated let’s look at the bonds to see if we could do that, it may not be necessary according to Ernesto’s calculation of the contributions.
Mr. Collin stated it seemed like a couple locations where a homeowner may have installed a drain or some sort of ditch, the CDD can only put dirt within your easement, but if that causing part of the problem then it would be my recommendation that you contact the homeowner and tell them to make the repairs on their own property.
The next item taken out or order.
SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration  of  Easement  Improvements
Policy (Presenter: Jennifer Kilinski)
Mr. Torres stated if you will recall at the last meeting a gentleman who spoke towards the end of the meeting, made a plea for the board to approve an encroachment into the easement. The letter is in your agenda book and I also emailed it to you. Also in the agenda book is a proposed policy.
Ms. Kilinski stated there is a cover letter that discussed some options as it relates to impediments in CDD easements. I talked to JMT a few times about this issue and I think from a staff perspective and let me know if you disagree, Steve, one of the things we discussed is easement encroachments that are impervious in nature versus things that may be capable of being removed. We talked about this at the last meeting and it was staff’s recommendation that you don’t allow any easement encroachments of hardscape, pools, or other impervious improvements that can’t easily be taken out. If you adopted this policy, this policy would be only for non-impervious types of encroachments. That doesn’t mean if you want a fence that it automatically gets granted, there may be situations where it doesn’t make sense because it is the only access to a pond we are doing restoration work on or other factors. If you wanted to have a policy in place as we have noted in some of the aerials that have been provided to us and as JMT has gotten more involved here there are currently a number of potential encroachments in CDD easements that we don’t necessarily have to require be removed, they are not causing issues today but there may be some that we want to get a policy in place for future homeowners who may want to install a fence or landscaping and we would have a process that you didn’t have to consider every time somebody said I want a fence there. It would be here is the policy, you pay a small amount of application fee for the engineer to go out to review it, you have a variance and it goes in the public records and now we know they

have been approved by the district rather than they do it and ask for forgiveness later or that we are having to go and notice everybody after the fact. That is what it is designed for, but I wanted to clarify because it is not real clear in the memo that after some discussion with staff because of the way our drainage easements work, it is not our recommendation that you approve any encroachment that would be of a non-movable nature.
Mr. DelBene asked in the event that the object has to be removed and we approved it, who pays for removing that object?
Ms. Kilinski stated it says in the policy and is also contained in the variance agreement that gets recorded for future property owners that any encroachment is always subject to removal if it needed for purposes of the integrity of the stormwater system and such removal and risk is at the residents expense. Essentially the District may grant the right of encroachment but you, homeowner, recognize that if we need to come in for an emergency situation it is going to be removed by us and you are going to have to pay to put it back if you desire it and if we need it removed for an express reason then it is going to be at the resident’s expense and may not be able to be put back.
Mr. Labanowski stated this is what we do on the HOA side on architectural review. As far as fences are concerned there is a statement on the letter that you are allowed to go to your property line and if for any reason it has to have access, it is your responsibility to remove it at your cost. We are not allowing a pond to be totally enclosed by fences. We have to leave at least one access point open.
Ms. Kilinski stated that is helpful because that is the case in most communities that the HOA is approving the aesthetics. The issue we sometimes face is that the HOA is blessing fences because that is an architectural control and residents have taken that as carte blanche that the person can put his fence in without regard to easement encroachments. The HOA doesn’t always know where that easement line is. Having the synergy between the district and HOA to say you have to get your fence blessed by the HOA but make sure if you are in an easement that you are also going to the district for their application process.
Mr. Wing asked does the HOA tell the homeowner they have to go to the CDD if they are in an easement?
Mr. Labanowski stated no, not for fences, anything else, yes. If you want to take the pool deck into the easement area we don’t allow that.

Mr. Wing asked if the HOA approves the fence into the easement they are notified that the if the CDD says remove it, you have to remove it.
Mr. Labanowski stated it is your responsibility, the same with people who put in landscaping, if they put it in the easement area it is their responsibility at that point. We look at the plats and as-builts.
Mr. Collin stated I reviewed the language and it seemed like there were two different options you were proposing. The main comment I have is if we recommend it not be approved, in this language it is automatically not approved.
Ms. Kilinski stated what would happen is there is always a due process next step, but the resident would get a letter just like the last gentleman got the letter that says, we reviewed it, denied, and he can come to the board and appeal to the board.
Mr. Collin stated in the other CDDs we work with it is always the CDD’s decision on these types of issues.
Ms. Kilinski stated you are an arm of the CDD - we typically try not to have the Board approve every single variance request. It may not be as problematic here, but we have some districts where we are getting several requests between board meetings and administratively it is incredibly burdensome. Ultimately, they are going to rely on your professional opinion more often then not. There may be some exceptions to that, but if you say this is a bad idea, it is a drainage easement and it is going to impact it, then most folks are going to say I defer to your judgement.
We always send a denial letter if it is denied and I can add that to the memo so that they know they will get an approval or denial.
Mr. Vencil stated we also need to cover JMT’s costs.
Ms. Kilinski stated we can work with JMT to determine what that amount is. Historically it has been between $350 and $500. We have the homeowner provide all the information to us, an exact schematic of what you are putting in, where you are putting it in and where your lot is so the job of JMT would be to just go look at the actual drainage easement and the improvement that is being put in and then we have this form of variance already that the homeowner can fill out and we would just review it for final sign-off, so it should be fairly minimal.
Mr. Vencil stated it seems highly unlikely that very many of these are going to get approved and I want to make sure the homeowners understand that when they do this it is almost always going to be a long shot before they start having work done.

Mr. DelBene asked what is the purpose of this? We are not going to allow any pools or structures? Anyone putting in a fence and encroaches in the easement, they are not putting it in the water.
Mr. Labanowski stated they are putting it on their property line and in some cases there is as much as 20-feet of easement into their yard. On the HOA side we are not trying to take away from the property use of the homeowner, we tell them that if it has to be moved, they have to move it.
Mr. DelBene stated JMT told us at a prior meeting that certain of the properties that put in fences are creating an additional burden on the ponds because of how the water goes into the pond.
Mr. Torres stated the CDD to this point has not reviewed any easement encroachments for fences or not, minus this last one. If the HOA is the one letting homeowners impede in the easement it hasn’t been brought forward to the CDD.
Mr. Wing stated that is what they have been doing since day one.

On MOTION by Mr. Wing seconded by Mr. Vencil with four in favor and Mr. Labanowski opposed the proposed easement encroachment policy, Option B was approved.

Ms. Kilinski stated I will update the memo to reflect what is definitely not going to be approved and what is likely to be considered but may not be approved as well.
Mr. Wing stated if we repair some of the pond banks, you are going to be out there again and if you see issues dealing with fences we need to know because we may need to to say you can’t put the fence there. We saw when we were walking around that the problem is where two fence posts come together and the runoff goes right there.
Ms. Burks stated if there is already a list of things that we know that we are not going to approve wouldn’t it be more beneficial if she put that in place that we don’t want to cost the homeowners money if we already know it is not going to be approved. Why not prepare a list of things that they should not even try to apply for. Have the HOA and CDD come to an agreement and speak the same language.
Mr. Collin stated it will take about 20 hours to put together plans and get bids for the pond bank repair.
Mr. DelBene stated let’s figure funding first before we spend $3,500 in planning.

Mr. Collin stated the permit the development got from the St. Johns River Water Management District also says you have to maintain your easement around your ponds, around all stormwater structures. This is an attorney question. I’m not certain that you would be able to give up any portion of your easement should that be desirable.
Ms. Kilinski stated we are not doing that. Mr. Collin left the meeting at this time.

FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration   of   Resolution   2021-02
Approving the Proposed Budget and Setting a Public Hearing Date for Adoption
Mr. Torres stated item four is consideration of Resolution 2021-02 approving the proposed budget for fiscal year 2022 and setting the public hearing for adoption. The public hearing will be August 10, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. At this point the FY22 budget does not require an increase in assessments. There was a minimum increase in district management, facility management per agreement so you will see some adjustments. If the board wants to keep the landscaping budget the same that means you would only consider those contractors that propose under the budgeted amount of $308,000. We had three landscape providers bid: Brightview, Trimac and Duval. Any consideration above that scope we would have to increase that budget line, which could possibly mean that would trigger a mailed notice to all the homeowners of a proposed increase in assessments. We will approve the budget at a higher rate and may adopt it at a lower rate.
Mr. DelBene asked what was the highest proposal?
Mr. Torres stated Yellowstone failed to appear at the mandatory meeting and they were at
$354,000 for the first year and an increase thereafter. The second highest was Down to Earth was
$329,000 for every year with no increase and Laura from Down to Earth is here today. Brightview was $294,000 with increases after that. Trimac was $281,000 for the first year and some increases and Duval was $266,000.
Mr. DelBene asked do you want to approve taking Yellowstone’s bid?
It was the consensus of the board to not accept the bid from Yellowstone.
Ms. Kilinski stated we probably want to do that separately. I think it is okay to get consensus around that for budget purposes, but in terms of rejecting them we will do that separately.

Mr. DelBene stated we would have to change the budget to go up to $329,946 for Down to Earth, which is about $21,000 budget increase.
Mr. Torres stated I’m trying to avoid a potential mailed notice that not only cost the district
$3,000 to do but it will create a lot of activity. You could consider a reduction in the capital reserve to make up the difference; I don’t think you have enough carry forward to cover that gap.
Mr. DelBene stated I know what you are saying but if we end up choosing Down to Earth and we did it in a roundabout way where we didn’t notify people that we were increasing the budget I don’t want to do it that way.
Ms. Kilinski stated you have to provide notice by law notice when you raise assessments over previously noticed amounts. You do have a meeting in June.
Mr. Torres stated that is correct if the budget stayed the same by moving from capital reserves to finance the landscaping line you would avoid a public notice and the budget stays the same. If that is an option you don’t want to exercise then we will fund it fully at $329,947 and notice it that way. We can delay the public notice until after the June meeting.
Mr. Wing stated I don’t want to take it out of capital reserve contribution and we are talking about taking a big chunk for pond bank repairs and unless we have a bond issue which some are against, I’m not looking for an increase but I would rather kick it up now, notice people and if we find ways to bring it down then bring it down.
Mr. Torres asked are there any other changes you would like to make to the budget before we approve it tonight, understanding that it is just an approval that we will adjust?
Mr. Wing stated once we propose the budget tonight we can’t go up, we can go down, but we cannot go up.
Mr. Torres stated that is correct.
Mr. Vencil stated I would like to make sure we cover the cost of the landscaping and the capital contribution. The other thing I want to address is that all the other CDDs our size and near us geographically meet monthly in order to address community concerns in a more timely manner. We have had things out there that have frustrated people in the neighborhood for six and seven weeks. Things get kicked down the road simply because we don’t get together enough to decide what we want to do. I would like to change that.
Ms. Burks stated I receive things outside of our meetings of concerns that have been brought up and sent to you of things that you ask us to review and see if we have any concerns or

questions. I don’t know that it is necessarily the time that we meet as being able to make sure we narrow things down in these meetings that we can actually get to the issues that are at hand.
Mr. Vencil stated some of the issues we are going to talk about today that everybody needs to make a decision on have been floating around out there for six or seven weeks. We have to vote on it, we can’t make a decision without a board vote and it has to wait until we get together. I don’t see why people in our neighborhood couldn’t have their concerns addressed in a timely manner. I’m bringing it up because this is the budget and we would have to budget for monthly meetings.
Mr. Torres stated we would have to adjust several line items, attorney fees, management fees, engineering fees, supervisors fees, legal noticing and I can ballpark it and adjust those line items so we at least put those things in the budget if the board wants to consider that. Now is the time to talk about it.
We would factor in under the administrative fee that is now $160,000 there will be an increase in the ballpark to $175,000, but it may be a little more.
Mr. DelBene asked are we going to include Down to Earth, keep capital reserves, and the additional admin fees for 12 meetings and that way we have to send a notice to all the residents.
Mr. Torres stated from what I’m hearing we are going to increase the landscaping contract from $308,000 to $329,000, I will estimate high on the administrative fee. Is there a change in capital reserves?
Mr. Wing stated if you add $20,000 for landscaping, $20,000 for extra meetings and at
$48,000 you raise the assessment by $50. Put in the $48,000 in the budget and we will figure out where it comes out from later as long as we know we can’t go any higher.
Mr. Labanowski stated that holds our feet to the fire as far as any pond bank repairs. Mr. Wing stated you can put in another $15,000 or $20,000 now.
Mr. Labanowski stated with the repairs that have to be done, that is a drop in the bucket. Mr. Wing stated then you are talking about taking the assessments up $100 or $150.
Mr. Labanowski stated I would like to see an increase in capital reserves of $200,000 if possible.
Mr. DelBene asked does anyone else want to have a proposed $200,000 increase in the budget for discussion at the next meeting?
Mr. Vencil stated we can discuss it, I don’t necessarily want to vote for it.

Mr. DelBene stated I can’t justify a $200,000 even as a discussion point, that is three noes and two yeses and that is not going to be put in the budget. Any other increases?
Mr. Wing stated I propose $48,000, round it to $50,000 if you want. Did we already go over that?
Mr. Torres stated yes, with the landscaping alone and the admin we are looking at another
$75,000 and that brings you from $1.126 million to $1.201 million.
Mr. DelBene stated I propose a one-time $100,000 increase to be put in capital reserves be for the pond bank restoration so we can meet the $200,000 threshold for that project.
Mr. Torres stated it will go from $1.126 million to $1,277,149, an increase of $151,000 and that is the worst-case scenario.

On MOTION by Mr. DelBene seconded by Ms. Burks with all in favor resolution 2021-02 approving the proposed budget as amended and setting a public hearing on the budget and assessments for August 10, 2021 was approved.

FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Update Regarding Proposals for Landscape
and Irrigation Maintenance
Mr. Torres stated the intent of tonight’s meeting is to let you know we received the proposals, you received them electronically and you also have hard copies. At the next meeting we will add to the agenda consideration of the proposals. I wanted to delay the selection to July’s meeting, because of the heavy cut season that we are in right now. When you notify a vendor that they are not going to be here next year, services go down. I will leave that decision to the board. You can select a new company in June, but there is some risk involved in that.
Mr. DelBene stated I’m fine with looking at the proposals in July.

SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration  of  Easement  Improvements
Policy (Presenter: Jennifer Kilinski)
This item taken earlier in the meeting.

SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Consideration of Agreement with the Fighting
Turtle	Swim	Team	(Presenter:	Jennifer Kilinski)
Mr. Torres stated the agreement is in draft form with some deletions and comments from Jennifer’s office.

Ms. Kilinski stated with reference to the resident comments at the beginning of the meeting; I was unaware that there was any dispute regarding ongoing use of the pool. Erick can talk a little bit about what those issues are and maybe give board direction on what you want to do for the interim.
This is your form agreement that you have approved previously. Last year was a little different because we had COVID protocols that USA Swimming had put out. Those have been removed. The comments you see in redline, there are a few things we were waiting on clarification from the swim team or wanted to get your direct approval on because they are a little bit different than what you have had in previous agreements.
The swim team specifically asked for the virtual meets, that wasn’t something that our office required. They wanted a cap increase from 60 to 90 swimmers and I wanted to bring that to your attention and make sure you had confirmed that was good. The swim team offered the two swim lanes be kept open at all times during team practices. Previously, we had one lane and if there was an abundance of residents using the pool they would go to a second, now they are offering two swim lanes from the start. The final comment I wanted to make was on page 5, they had requested to remove this 10% revenue share that we have in all of our license agreements. My review of previous agreements is we had that 10% in there as we have had with all our vendors. I know this is a mostly a resident team so I wanted to bring that for your review because previously you had directed staff to keep this 10% revenue to the district on all of our agreements. Otherwise, it is substantially the same form you have seen it for the last four or five years.
Mr. DelBene stated I listened to what they did at other meets. Are they allowed to bring and sell food and beverages as they do in other communities?
Ms. Kilinski stated right now we haven’t specified whether they can or can’t run concessions. Different teams have requested different things. Those are outside vendors and right now we have no outside vendors so you wouldn’t be able to bring in a food truck.
Mr. DelBene stated something like donuts like he suggested.
Ms. Kilinski stated there is nothing in the agreement that prevents that at this point. If there are things that we can do to make this agreement more clear I am happy to do it.
Mr. DelBene stated I want to make sure they have the same opportunities as other teams and if it is not in the agreement, let’s make it clear to them that they are allowed to do that so long as it is not a third-party vendor.

Mr. Vencil stated would the 10% be a part of this as well?
Mr. DelBene stated I voted against releasing the 10% on one other organization and I’m going to remain consistent. Every organization that comes in here pays the same fee, we have one fee agreement and it is the same. Let them bring in concessions and raise money in other ways, but I’m going to remain consistent and say that all organizations that use our facilities pay a user fee of that 10%.
Mr. Vencil stated that is for all revenue.
Mr. Wing stated just for what they charge the swimmers. Ms. Kilinski stated that is what we have done.
Mr. Vencil stated that needs to be 10% of all revenue.
Ms. Hoffman stated we have never paid the 10%, we are a non-profit and I have my EIN number. We have never paid that before, we do not run concessions at the practices, we do at the meets, but we yield maybe $80. We are having virtual meets at this point and virtual meets mean that it is just our team so we are not doing concessions this year.
Mr. Wing stated in other words the 10% has been in the agreement, but it has never been
paid.
Ms. Hoffman stated I sent back messages to Ernesto and Sarah for the last three years, This
is not something we have done, this is something that was in the proposal. There is an agreement that came back for me to sign two weeks ago.
Ms. Kilinski stated last year I think we did away with all gross revenue requirements for pretty much all our vendors because they were on limited space availability, but in previous years the board requested that we treat all of our licensees the same. There are a lot of non-profit organizations, I’m not saying you have to charge them at all, I’m just saying that was the reason it was added to the agreement or it has been in the agreement historically because that was the direction from the board. I can’t attest as to whether we collected or not and would add that the change to add 10% revenue share to all of our agreements was made in 2019, it may have been after this agreement was executed.
Ms. Hoffman stated we charge $180 for 17 weeks and part of that money goes to paying the insurance policy and league fees. If we are doing the 10% I really need to increase the registration because I would be in a deficit at that point.

Mr. Labanowski stated we are not talking about a lot of money and most of it is community anyway. It was a different story if it were a business operating out of here to make money. They are not trying to make money, they are trying to run an organization of kids in our community. As far as I’m concerned you can do away with that 10%.
Mr. DelBene asked which vendor did this board voted to waive the 10% on? Mr. Torres stated it may have been the swim team.
Mr. Hutchinson stated there is one, but I don’t remember.
Ms. Burks stated then the swim team is the only one that doesn’t pay.
Mr. Vencil stated it isn’t fair to collect from one sport and not the others. We need to be consistent.
Mr. Wing asked have you already charged your registration fees for the year? Ms. Hoffman responded yes.

Mr. Vencil moved to approve the agreement with the Fighting Turtles to include the 10% to be paid to the district.

Mr. Wing said the hours are in the schedule, 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. Tuesday through Friday from June to July 31.
Ms. Hoffman stated the afternoon hours were on the bottom of the proposal as a special consideration and when we talked in March you were at the end of your meeting and said everything was approved. I emailed Ernesto and said what was approved because we had also asked for afternoon practices while King & Bear was going to get fixed. Everything was in the proposal. That is how we have been operating because of what was in the proposal at the last meeting.
Mr. DelBene stated I don’t mind them using the facility while King & Bear is down, so long as they leave two lanes open and that is only for the next 11 days. I don’t think Erick intended to shut them down.

Ms. Burks seconded the motion and on voice vote with four in favor and Mr. Labanowski opposed the motion passed.

EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion	of	Traffic	Calming	Study
(Presenter: Ernesto Torres)
Mr. Torres stated the county said the study consisted of traffic volumes and speed in several locations evaluating both travel directions to determine if traffic calming devices are warranted at any of the individual locations. Upon review none of the locations have met the warrant for traffic calming devices and the county has determined not to move forward with any traffic calming at any of these locations. The roads are not owned by the CDD, the are owned by the county, otherwise you would be maintaining those roads.
Mr. Vencil stated the HOA decided at the last meeting to form a committee and one of the things they wanted to do was continue working with JSO to make sure that enforcement of traffic rules is being maintained, particularly in a couple of the spots there they conducted the study. A lot of people asked for more stop signs but that is not on the table. People in the neighborhood like to park on the street and the county views that as a positive and they feel that is a traffic calming measure that is going to assist in keeping speeds down in the neighborhood.

NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Discussion of Staff Interaction to Resident
Complaints (Presenter: Ernesto Torres)
Mr. Torres stated throughout the month and between meetings staff does its best to take residents input when it comes to issues related to our contractors in addressing those issues. We try to do that in a timely fashion. You are fortunate to have an onsite operations management and onsite amenity manager, some communities don’t have that. I don’t think that courtesy we extend to the residents should be abused, to the degree that we are taken away from someone’s performance or duties, daily tasks to answer resident’s emails, to the tune of over 100 emails in this short period of time. I didn’t put the emails in your agenda book to make them a public record, but they are there. I’m bringing this to your attention to (a) make you aware and (b) to have some discussion as to what direction you would like to give staff when an incident like this occurs. It has become ineffective to answer an email over and over and over.
Mr. Wing asked are most of these on landscaping type issues? Mr. Torres responded yes.
Mr. Wing asked from a small group of people? Mr. Torres stated a household.

Mr. Vencil stated it is hard to stop someone from trying to communicate who wants to tell you something, however, we can set more reasonable expectations as far as responding to those incoming communications. If someone is emailing multiple times a day, every day, it would be more reasonable that the person may not expect to get multiple emails back every day, even getting one email back every day. It may be more reasonable to expect staff to communicate with the resident once or twice a week. I don’t want to create a situation where people feel like they can’t give their feedback but I don’t feel like you should be spending four hours a day doing emails.
Mr. Torres stated that is where we are at. They are spending a considerable amount of time answering emails.
Mr. Vencil stated responding to each email is not reasonable. Responding to people once or twice a week should be okay. I don’t know the level of detail and frequency of response is necessarily required even if someone decides they want to email you every hour.
Mr. DelBene stated I think we should have a policy in place for this. If it borders harassment they have to abide by the same treatment of staff as anyone else. Send them a notice pursuant to our policy regarding the treatment of staff and notify them that you consider the emails harassment. That is their warning and after that it is going to be suspension of amenity privileges. We are asking that you treat staff as professionals. If a staff member gets harassed every single day on something they have already provided a response for that is an issue of harassment.

TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Staff Reports (Part 2)
Attorney - (Presenter: Jennifer Kilinski)
Ms. Kilinski stated you should have been receiving the Capital Conversations updates. The session has ended, a few noteworthy bills passed, the first one being the COVID liability bill that includes protections for special districts, which essentially says that if a would be plaintiff wanted to file a lawsuit against religious organizations, businesses, units of government, universities, pretty much everybody under the sun, then there has to be proof that unit of government or business was failing to substantially comply with any federal, state or local guidelines in place at the time the suit gave rise and also you have to have an attestation from a doctor that said that they definitely contracted it in that place. It insulates most businesses from lawsuits, with a high bar for would be plaintiffs. There were also a couple other bills, a fiscal transparency bill that will require some additional reporting, which really is going to impact more district management and auditors than

anything you will see before you except you will see more categories in your audits than you did previously. There have been a couple new construction provisions that we will be adding to our construction RFPs as it relates to foreign countries of concern. Otherwise, nothing too significant to report on. The session starts again, hearings will start in late September and we know that amendment 12 is coming, which will definitely have some interesting special district repercussions because it is all about public officials.

Manager – Report on Number of Registered Voters 2,181 (Presenter: Ernesto Torres)
A copy of the letter from the supervisor of elections indicating that there are 2,181 registered voters residing within the district was included in the agenda package.

Operation Manager – (Presenter: Jerry Lambert)
Memorandum
Mr. Lambert reviewed the memorandum, copy of which was included in the agenda package.

Field Operations Manager Picture Report
A copy of the operations manager picture report was included in the agenda package.

Duval Audit Reports
A copy of the Duval audit reports was included in the agenda package.

Consideration of Playground Mulch

On MOTION by Mr. DelBene seconded by Mr. Wing with all in favor the proposal from First Coast Mulch in the amount of $4,905.00 was approved.

Tennis Court Fence Proposal

On MOTION by Mr. Wing seconded by Ms. Burks with three in favor and Mr. Vencil and Mr. Labanowski opposed the proposals from Fenced Up in the amount of $7,258 and $1,540 were approved.

Consideration of Playground Drinking Fountain
This item tabled.

Hoover Pump Rain Gage Proposal
This item tabled.

Consideration of Grass Seeding
This item tabled.

Dog Station Locations
A map of indicating the locations of the dog stations was included in the agenda package.

Amenity Center Update (Presenter: Erick Hutchinson)
Mr. Hutchinson stated the kids triathlon with Joe Fertsch will be August 1, 2021 starting at 9:00 a.m. at the pool, run across the amenity field to the jogging trail, on their bikes with helmets and shoes in place and cut back through the amenity field. There will be three age groups, 6-8, 9- 11, 12-14 and last time he charged $35 per participant, the district will receive $5 per participate and he donates the rest to a charity.

On MOTION by Mr. DelBene seconded by Mr. Wing with all in favor the kid’s triathlon on August 1, 2021 was approved.

Mr. Hutchinson stated I’m requesting you to extend the agreement for my storage unit with Cube Smart. When we spoke in November you said it would be for six months and we would revisit whether or not we wanted to move forward with a shed or potentially extend it for another six months at a cost of $81.16 per month.

On MOTION by Mr. Wing seconded by Mr. DelBene with all in favor staff was authorized to extend the lease of the storage unit another six months.

Mr. Hutchinson stated someone approached me about donating money to this community and wanted to remain anonymous. It would be specifically to heat the pool. They would pay the initial cost of installation. I reached out to several companies and am having a problem getting someone to give me a quote, but I’m working on that.
Mr. Wing asked would this person be interested in light it?
Mr. Hutchinson stated their agenda was focused because of the swim team and they thought the swim team would benefit from this. I don’t have any more specifics, but I wanted to keep you in the loop and I wanted to see if that was even something you may be okay with.
Mr. Wing stated the only thing I would ask is maybe you or Ernesto or Jennifer find out the annual cost of heating the pool at King & Bear so we have an idea of the ongoing cost.
Mr. Torres stated Rivertown also has that and we will find out the cost.
Mr. Hutchinson stated the gate by the playground area is constantly left open. We can keep it demagnetized whether we remove it or just contact the security company and demagnetize it, but we would put a latch on that gate. People are leaving it open because all the sports groups go in and out, potentially people who are non-residents and residents that just forget their access cards and you have to use your card to go back out so they leave it propped open. We have incurred some costs to fix the gate from time to time and I’m proposing that we keep it demagnetized or remove it, put in a latch and hopefully, the gate will stay closed. I think we can do that for about
$40 versus putting a button on the other side like the pool.

On MOTION by Mr. DelBene seconded by Mr. Vencil with all in favor staff was authorized to have the gate demagnetized and to install a latch system.

Mr. Hutchinson stated I’m neutral and don’t care how you vote, but I feel that I have to present everything that is brought ot me and let you decide. The high school team, the school being built is not getting a pool and I spoke with Jeff, who is with the high school, and he would love to be able to use Murabella’s pool. They are requesting access to our pool before the pool is open to the residents, early in the morning from August 2, to sometime in October. I mentioned

to him because of what we had with the Fighting Turtles due to what happened at King & Bear and I don’t want to run into that same scenario. I have one side that want to access the pool, but they can’t and on the other side it is beneficial for the kids.
Mr. Wing asked who opens at half hour before sunrise?
Mr. Hutchinson stated the summer hours we are talking 9 a.m. during winter hours 10 a.m.
Mr. Wing stated half an hour before sunrise and they want to do this in August and they want to do this before residents, so they can’t do it. I’m trying to figure out how this works.
Mr. Labanowski stated it is not lighted.
Mr. DelBene stated right now it is not an option since our pool is not lighted.

ELEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Supervisor’s   Requests   and   Audience
Comments
A resident stated on the pool hours the way it reads it is almost 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. Pool cleaning used to be Monday so it opened at 1 p.m. on Monday and other days at 10 a.m. If it is open 30 minutes after sunrise to 30 minutes before sunset it is not stated clearly up there. The way it reads now it is almost 10 a.m. to 10 p.m., which is not true. Make it more clear because I didn’t know what the hours were.
Mr. DelBene stated look into a sign. Mr. Hutchinson stated I will.
A resident stated there has been a lot of communication between quite a few people about how they have reached out to the CDD about strangers being in back of their house, no signage posted that says you are not supposed go behind private homes, there is nothing posted anywhere. People have been asking for the CDD to put up signs at the beginning where the homes start, saying no trespassing behind private homes and the area that is CDD property, that is where they can fish from. Emails were sent a year ago and nothing has happened. Since you created this policy you have left it to the homeowners to deal with the people behind their house.
Ms. Kilinski stated just to remind the board, the policy you passed was not to allow people to go behind private property. The district does not have police powers, we don’t have the authority to arrest people or trespass people on our own – we can suspend privileges if we know they are residents. This is an issue at every community that has ponds. You are well within your rights to put up signage and we can think about that and find locations where that is appropriate where the district actually owns property. Usually our issue is easement rights for maintenance

versus putting a sign on private property. We can look for those opportunities if that is something you want to explore. The other part is a robust interaction with the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office and I know people don’t like to hear that but you are not going to put Jerry or a member of staff up here at midnight with the same situation that is happening with homeowners will happen with staff. The right option is to use St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office if residents are afraid or see strangers in their backyards. If you are having St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office coming to the HOA to talk about ways for safety and speed, that is probably a great opportunity to engage them on these other issues.
A resident stated we have brought it up in our HOA meeting, in order to get the signage approved we will ask the CDD to reimburse us so we could purchase the signs outright instead of waiting for the 60 days for the CDD to actually purchase and make a decision on the signage. The signage needs to be in place otherwise it is fair game for anyone to go anywhere they please. Action is needed immediately and we don’t want to have to go to the next meeting. As the HOA board president I request that you grant us the $800 to purchase the signs and get them installed on CDD property or are we going to have to find other means to get signage posted.
Mr. DelBene asked can you please forward to me any email directly to the CDD where you specifically request the signage? We are unaware of any such email being sent to us.
A resident stated I can provide emails to Ernesto and to Erick.
Ms. Burks asked what is the problem with us voting to put a sign these areas?
Mr. Torres stated if I as staff get an email during the month asking for signage we are not going to act on it. We work for the board and at the board’s direction.
Ms. Burks asked what is the process?
Mr. Torres stated we have to pay for the signs and designate the areas as Jennifer pointed out that belong to the CDD.
Mr. DelBene asked how many signs are on the quote we haven’t seen?
A resident stated 10 signs with 10 galvanized posts and the hardware to mount them. That doesn’t include the physical post digging and pouring concrete, but it is $800 for the custom signage that says no trespassing, no fishing, residents only past this point. This would be mounted in pond area facing the entrance point.
Mr. DelBene asked will you email that quote to Ernesto so we can have this on the June meeting agenda?

A resident stated yes, I will do that.
Mr. Vencil stated some people are going to ignore the signs and the residents are going to have to call the sheriff’s office.
A resident stated we have invited the sheriff’s office to come to the next HOA meeting and go over that kind of safety protocol, when is the appropriate time to call, and have that sheriff be a part of our community in that regard. Without that signage there before our meeting on the 19th it is going to be very difficult for them to say, we will enforce it and make sure you feel very safe in your backyard.
Mr. DelBene stated I don’t hear any opposition on the signage, but we need it on our agenda to approve the expenditure and the line item.
Ms. Kilinski stated I will also say that we work with the St. Johns County Sheriff’s Office without having signage posted, where they come out and trespass people based on policies. If we need help getting in touch with somebody at the sheriff’s office in St. Johns County we as staff can coordinate. The signage is great we can get the signage that will make really clear to folks that are going back there, but there should be no reason that the signage is the precursor to having a conversation with the sheriff’s office to get some of this stuff handled on private property.
Ms. Venezia stated thank you very much for not choosing the rubber mulch; after being in the sun for a week it becomes extremely toxic. You mentioned people not power washing the white fence in San Marino, I feel if residents have to power wash the sidewalk they should be able to power wash the back of the white fence. Are you aware that we have residents who are kayaking in the pond? That needs to be addressed. We need to get a newsletter to the residents so they are aware of what they should and should not be doing in the ponds. Where do you have a policy that indicates that a CDD board member should not harass or criticize a resident on social media? I would like to see you have a policy in that regard. We have been talking about pond banks for years, unfortunately, many people don’t understand that the pond banks are infrastructure that is critical to the community, that helps maintain our home values because that is where everyone’s water goes if you live on a pond or not. If we had listened to the University of Florida five years ago we may not be having this issue at this time because they would have been working with us partially compensating for the fee and they would have their own people working on ponds and the board has continued to ignore that situation and within five years we could have had all the ponds done.

Mr. Sleven stated I want to thank the board for taking the action with the landscaping in the community. Thank you for listening to the residents and expecting residents to give feedback. We all know the last four months of a contract is potentially the worst and this board has to try to make the last four months of this contract the best and I think it is in your power to do so.
Mr. Labanowski stated is the Pescara fence completed?
Mr. Lambert stated I’m not calling the company, I will have it done.
Mr. Labanowski asked can we get the street lights clear of all the tree branches? Mr. Lambert stated sure.
Mr. Torres asked is that trimming the canopy? We will need a quote for that.
Ms. Burks stated we talked about the situation and again, I reiterate about how they cut the yards back there because it effects a lot of houses back there. Talk to them, they can’t cut the yards and not clear up the debris.
Mr. DelBene stated I would like to look at putting the bench back under the canopy, pavilion on South Bellagio. I know we took it out two or three years ago because of the condition of the bench. Those grass areas over there are also atrocious. Is there a drain in that area? Essentially, the developer put in a large flat grass area that tilts towards the center of the grass where I think a drain should be but it doesn’t look like there is a drain in that area and it puddles. We need to correct that.
Mr. Labanowski stated there is a drain in that area, it may be blocked.
Mr. Lambert stated if the drain isn’t blocked there is another engineering study we are going to have because the pathway behind South Bellagio is deep in water every time it sprinkles.

TWELFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Approval  of  Consent  Agenda  (Presenter:
Ernesto Torres)
Approval of Minutes of the March 9, 2021 Meeting
Balance Sheet as of April 30, 2021 and Statement of Revenues & Expenditures for the Period Ending April 30, 2021; Month-to-Month Income Statement; Assessment Receipt Schedule
Approval of Check Register
Ratification of Agreement with Clarson & Associates for Professional Topographical Surveying services
Ratification of Agreement with The Joy of Tennis Academy

Ratification of Memorandum of Understanding with St. Johns County Property Appraiser

On MOTION by Mr. Wing seconded by Mr. Labanowski with all in favor the consent agenda items were approved.

THIRTEENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS	Next Scheduled Meeting – June 8, 2021 at 6:30
p.m.

On MOTION by Ms. Burks seconded by Mr. DelBene with all in favor the meeting adjourned at 10:17 p.m.

Secretary/Assistant Secretary	Chairman/Vice Chairman